bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Electroencephalographic activity patterns distinguish interdigitated default and frontoparietal networks
Aaron KucyiiD, David Braun, Lotus Shareef-Trudeau, Amir Adler, Dimitrios Pantazis
Abstract
The brain is comprised of distributed functional networks that operate on diverse time scales. Evidence from precision fMRI shows that canonical networks, including default (DN), frontoparietal control (FPCN), and dorsal attention (dATN), each fractionate into multiple finely interdigitated networks. However, as fMRI is blind to fast processes underlying neural communication, there remains a need to neurophysiologically characterize individual-level network fractionation. To address this need, we conducted a simultaneous EEG-fMRI study, including multiple sessions per individual, resting-state and task conditions, and carbon wire loop sensors for optimized artifact correction. Using precision network mapping, we discovered dissociable electrophysiological correlates of blood-oxygen-level-dependent activity for two networks within the boundaries of the canonical DN. One (DNa) related more positively with alpha and high-beta power, while another (DNb) related more negatively with theta and low-beta power. Univariate and machine learning analyses further revealed electrophysiological dissociations between networks within the canonical FPCN (FPCNa versus FPCNb) but not dATN. The network-specific electrophysiological activity patterns were reliable across sessions, only modestly variable between resting-state and demanding task conditions, and observable for neighboring nodes of different networks across multiple cortical zones. Our findings provide insight into rhythmic neural processes that fine-grained networks may engage to support divergent cognitive operations.
- organism: human
- assay: electrophysiology
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Oscillatory mechanisms of intrinsic brain networks
Youjing Luo, Xianghong Meng, … Pengfei Xu·bioRxiv·Jul 7, 2022
- Anticorrelated inter-network electrophysiological activity varies dynamically with attentional performance and behavioral states
Aaron Kucyi, Amy L. Daitch, … Josef Parvizi·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 16, 2020
- Aperiodic measures of neural excitability are associated with anticorrelated hemodynamic networks at rest: a combined EEG-fMRI study
Michael Jacob, Brian J. Roach, … Judith M. Ford·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 16, 2021
- Antagonistic behavior of brain networks mediated by low-frequency oscillations: electrophysiological dynamics during internal-external attention switching
Jiří Hammer, Michaela Kajšová, … Petr Marusič·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2024
- Resolving the connectome - Spectrally-specific functional connectivity networks and their distinct contributions to behaviour
Robert Becker, Alexis Hervais‐Adelman·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Aug 21, 2020
- Concordant dynamic changes of global network properties in the frontoparietal and limbic compartments: an EEG study
Tien‐Wen Lee, Gerald Tramontano, Clay Hinrichs·BioSystemsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024