Consequences of combining sex-specific life-history traits

Abstract

Males and females evolved distinct life-history strategies, reflected in diverse inter-linked life-history traits. The sex that allocates more resources towards offspring relies on an increased life span, and long life requires an efficient immune system. The other sex needs to attract mates and thus allocates its resources towards ornamentation, which may negatively correlate with investment into the immune defense. Such sex-specific resource allocation trade-offs are not always strictly female or male-specific but may depend on the overall resources allocated towards life-history traits. Informed by experimental data, we designed a theoretical framework that combines multiple life-history traits. We disentangled specific life-history strategies from particular sex, allowing us to include species with reversed sex-roles and male parental investment. We computed the lifetime reproductive success (combining fitness components from diverse sex-specific life-history traits) observing a strong bias in adult sex ratio depending on sex-specific resource allocation towards life-history traits. Overall, our work provides a generalized method to combine various life-history traits with sex-specific differences to calculate lifetime reproductive success. The results explain specific population-level empirical observations as a consequence of sexual dimorphism in life-history traits.