Disturbance provides limited respite for native fish against invaders

Abstract

Understanding how flow-related disturbance regimes influence species interactions is critical for conserving threatened species in freshwater ecosystems, where both the alteration of these regimes and the invasion of non-native species pose major threats. Using 30 years of sampling data from a well-studied river system in Aotearoa New Zealand, we applied empirically- parameterized Lotka-Volterra competition models across a gradient of flood disturbance regimes to assess the potential for coexistence between threatened native galaxiids and invasive trout. Our models suggest trout dominate under low disturbance regimes, leading to galaxiid extinction. Coexistence peaks at intermediate disturbance regimes, though native fish densities are highly suppressed. Only at high disturbance regimes do native fish prevail, but priority effects are likely. Thus, restoration and conservation efforts focused solely on high disturbance habitats without accompanying biological interventions may not ensure native fish persistence. Further, prioritizing such habitats at the expense of others risks misdirecting resources towards sub-optimal conditions, particularly under climate change.