bioRxivBiochemistryPreprint
Multi-species benchmark analysis for LC-MS/MS validation and performance evaluation in bottom-up proteomics
Abstract
We present an instrument-independent benchmarking procedure and software (LFQ_bout) for validation and comparative evaluation of the performance of LC-MS/MS and data processing workflows in bottom-up proteomics. It enables back-to-back comparison of common and emerging workflows, e.g. diaPASEF or ScanningSWATH, and evaluates the impact of arbitrary, inadequately documented settings or black-box data processing algorithms. The procedure enhances the overall performance and quantitative accuracy while enabling the detection of major error types.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A comprehensive LFQ benchmark dataset on modern day acquisition strategies in proteomics
Bart Van Puyvelde, Simon Daled, … Maarten Dhaenens·Scientific DataPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2022
- LFQ Benchmark Dataset - Generation Beta: Assessing Modern Proteomics Instruments and Acquisition Workflows with High-Throughput LC Gradients
Bart Van Puyvelde, Robbe Devreese, … Maarten Dhaenens·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2026
- A simple approach for accurate peptide quantification in MS-based proteomics
T. M. Mendes Maia, A. Staes, … F. Impens·bioRxiv·Jul 16, 2019
- Extensive and accurate benchmarking of DIA acquisition methods and software tools using a complex proteomic standard
Clarisse Gotti, Florence Roux‐Dalvai, … Arnaud Droit·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2021
- ProteoBench: the community-curated platform for comparing proteomics data analysis workflows
Robbe Devreese, Caroline Jachmann, … Marie Locard‐Paulet·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2025
- WOMBAT-P: Benchmarking Label-Free Proteomics Data Analysis Workflows
David Bouyssié, Pınar Altıner, … Veit Schwämmle·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2023