Ecology and EvolutionZoologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Mobilisation of data from natural history collections can increase the quality and coverage of biodiversity information
Abstract
AimQuantify potential gains to insect data on the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) through further digitisation of natural history collections, assess to what degree this would fill biases in spatial and environmental record coverage, and deepen understanding of environmental bias with regard to climate rarity. LocationAfrotropical realm (mainland only) Time period1814-2022 Major taxa studiedCatharsius Hope, 1837 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) MethodsWe compared inventory completeness of Afrotropical Catharsius GBIF data to a dataset which combined these with records from a recent taxonomic revision. We analysed how this improved dataset reduced regional and environmental bias in the distribution of occurrence records using an approach that identifies well-surveyed spatial units of 100x100km as well as emerging techniques to classify rarity of climates. ResultsThe number of cells for which inventory completeness could be calculated, as well as coverage of climate types by "well-sampled" cells, increased three-fold when using the combined set compared to the GBIF set. Improvements to sampling in Central and Western Africa were particularly striking. Coverage of rare climates was similarly improved, as not a single well-sampled cell from the GBIF data alone occurred in the rarest climate types. Inclusion of further records from natural history collections increased the total number of occurrences, but also filled persisting spatial and environmental data gaps on GBIF. Main conclusionsThese findings support existing literature that suggests data gaps on GBIF are still pervasive, especially for insects and in the tropics and, so, is not yet ready to serve as a standalone data source for all taxa. Biases in spatial coverage of records translate to uneven sampling of environmental conditions, hindering our ability to describe the full breadth of species niches, especially so in climates that occur infrequently. However, we show that natural history collections hold the necessary information to fill many of these gaps, and their further digitisation should be a priority.
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Closing Gaps But Increasing Bias In North American Butterfly Inventory Completeness
V. Shirey, M. W. Beltiz, … R. Guralnick·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2020
- Global vascular plants reveal persistent gaps across taxa and ecoregions
Everton A. Maciel·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- Capacity building needed to reap the benefits of access to biodiversity collections
Quentin Groom, Sofie Meeus, … Jodey Peyton·Plants People PlanetPeer-reviewed·Jun 8, 2025
- Spatial bias in GBIF data has limited impact on plant climate niche properties in Europe
Thibault Coquery, Erik Welk, Lotte Korell·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2026
- Global and national trends in documenting and monitoring species distributions
R. Y. Oliver, C. Meyer, … W. Jetz·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2020
- Keys to the cabinet: unlocking biodiversity data in public entomology collections
Joel F. Gibson, Mackenzie H.W. Howse, … Dezene P.W. Huber·The Canadian EntomologistPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024