henhaobio
Sign in

Genetics Selection EvolutionGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article

The long-term effects of genomic selection: Response to selection, additive genetic variance and genetic architecture

Yvonne C. J. WientjesiD, Piter BijmaiD, M.P.L. CalusiD, Bas J. ZwaaniD, Zulma Gladis VitezicaiD, Joost van den HeuveliD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Genomic selection has revolutionized genetic improvement in animals and plants, but little is known of its long term effects. Here we investigate the long-term effects of genomic selection on the change in the genetic architecture of traits over generations. We defined the genetic architecture as the subset, allele frequencies and statistical additive effects of causal loci. We simulated a livestock population under 50 generations of phenotypic, pedigree, or genomic selection for a single trait, controlled by either only additive, additive and dominance, or additive, dominance and epistatic effects. The simulated epistasis was based on yeast data. The observed change in genetic architecture over generations was similar for genomic and pedigree selection, and slightly smaller for phenotypic selection. Short-term response was highest with genomic selection, while long-term response was highest with phenotypic selection, especially when non-additive effects were present. This was mainly because the loss in genetic variance and in segregating loci was much greater with genomic selection. Compared to pedigree selection, genomic selection lost a similar amount of the genetic variance but maintained more segregating loci, which on average had lower minor allele frequencies. For all selection methods, the presence of epistasis limited the changes in allele frequency and the fixation of causal loci, and substantially changed the statistical additive effects over generations. Our results show that non-additive effects can have a substantial impact on the change in genetic architecture. Therefore, non-additive effects can substantially impact the accuracy and future genetic gain of genomic selection.

Citations
52
FWCI
5.88
Field percentile
top 3%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWientjes '23Pocrnić '23Labroo '22Деген '23Lara '21Fradgley '23
82% semantic matchGenetics
Yvonne C. J. Wientjes, Piter Bijma, Joost van den Heuvel+3 more·Genetics·Jul 28, 2023· 10 citations