bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Matrix game between full siblings in Mendelian populations
Abstract
We demonstrate that static evolutionary stability implies the stability of the corresponding interior equilibrium point in genotype dynamics, while a certain form of monotonicity ensures the global stability of a homozygote state. We apply our findings to familial selection in a diploid, panmictic population, where the survival rates of siblings within monogamous and exogamous families are determined by a matrix game, and the behavior is uniquely determined by an autosomal recessive-dominant or intermediate allele pair. We provide conditions for the existence of each homozygote. In our numerical investigations of the Prisoners Dilemma between siblings, we distinguish two scenarios: cooperation (collaborating case) or defector-cooperator strategy pair (alternating case) that maximizes the siblings survival rates. Based on the stability of the pure cooperator and defector states, we provide a potential classification of genotype dynamics. We find that the pure cooperator population cannot fixate in the alternating case. However, in the collaborating case, fixation is possible but not necessary, since bistability, coexistence, moreover, the monostable fixation of pure defector state can also occur due to the interplay between the phenotypic payoff function and the genotype-phenotype mapping, which collectively determine the outcome of natural selection. In donation game, the classical Hamiltons rule implies the fixation of the cooperation in all considered genotype-phenotype mappings. Author SummaryIn this article, we explore the dynamics among full siblings who can mutually aid each other for survival. The strategy (cooperator or defector) of each sibling is determined by Mendelian (dominant-recessive or intermediate) inheritance. The interaction between two siblings is modelled as a Prisoners Dilemma. We examine two scenarios: cooperation (collaborating case) and a defector-cooperator strategy pair (alternating case), aiming to maximize the combined survival rates of the interacting siblings. The endpoint of natural selection is determined by Mendelian inheritance and the two Prisoners dilemma scenarios. Our findings reveal the potential for the fixation of both cooperation and defection, as well as the stable coexistence of these strategies within the studied selection environment. Notably, in the alternating case, the fixation of a pure cooperating population is not achievable under the considered inheritance systems. Furthermore, when cooperation is recessive, its fixation is more likely but not guaranteed.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Game of full siblings in Mendelian populations
J. Garay, A. Szilagyi, … T. F. Mori·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2022
- Survival cost sharing among altruistic full siblings in Mendelian population
József Garay, I. López, … Tamás F. Móri·BMC Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2024
- Fixation of a homozygote and dynamical characterization of the Price equation
József Garay, Tamás F. Móri·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2026
- Emergence of alternative offspring care patterns from the evolution of parental negotiation strategies
Jia Zheng, Franz J. Weissing, Davide Baldan·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 4, 2025
- A Two-Player Iterated Survival Game
J. Wakeley, M. Nowak·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2018
- Subsistence of sib altruism in different mating systems and Haldane arithmetic
J. Garay, V. Csiszar, T. F. Mori·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2022