bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Trash-basket epiphytes as secondary foundation species: a review of their distribution and effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions
G. Ortega-Solis, I. Diaz, D. Mellado-Mansilla, C. Tejo, F. Tello, D. Craven, H. Kreft, J. Armesto
Abstract
BackgroundSecondary foundation species (FS) are organisms that inhabit ecosystems structurally defined by a primary foundation species, providing additional structure to habitats and communities. Trash-basket epiphytes (TBE) are secondary FS that enhance arboreal soil accumulation, providing shelter to animals, and rooting sites for plants. While their importance may vary across biomes, TBE have been overlooked as drivers of biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Here, we discuss the prevalence of TBE across biomes, their effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and future research directions. MethodsWe performed a systematic literature review of articles, books and theses and collated and synthesised information about the taxonomic distribution of TBE, their effects on ecosystem functions, and reports of plant-animal and plant-plant interactions. Then, we analysed the global distribution of TBE using a generalized linear model and summarised two studies to assess their effects on soil invertebrates. ResultsWe identified 120 publications describing 209 species of TBE. Most TBE belong to Araceae (43%), Polypodiaceae (23%), and Orchidaceae (14%) and occur in all tropical and southern temperate forests. TBE richness peaks in the South-American Pacific mangroves, Eastern Cordillera Real, and the Napo moist forests. TBE effects on ecosystem functions include arboreal soil accumulation, water retention and temperature regulation in the canopy, and nutrient leaching through stem-flow. TBE provide shelter to species in more than 97 animal families, including from invertebrates to mammals, while 72 vascular plants have been reported to root in arboreal soil of TBE. ConclusionsTBE are a compelling group of model organisms that can be used to study ecological processes such as facilitation cascades, niche construction, extended phenotypes, or the effects of secondary FS on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. TBE should also be included in forest management plans to enhance the availability of microhabitats in the canopy supporting its associated flora and fauna.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Are foundation species effects different than those of dominant species? A case study of ant assemblages in northeastern North American forests
Sydne Record, Tempest McCabe, … Aaron M. Ellison·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2016
- Forest decline differentially affects trophic guilds of canopy-dwelling beetles
A. Salle, G. Parmain, … C. Bouget·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2020
- Fungal-beetle networks in deadwood are modular and shaped by tree species and deadwood type
Maria Faticov, Anders Dahlberg, … Anne‐Maarit Hekkala·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2026
- TOP-DOWN CLIMATIC PROCESSES MODULATE BIODIVERSITY-FUNCTIONING RELATIONSHIPS ACROSS NORTH AMERICAN FORESTS
Xavier Serra‐Maluquer, Óscar Godoy, … Marta Rueda·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2024
- Spatial distribution of Tree-related Microhabitats in a primeval mountain forest: from natural patterns to landscape planning and forest management recommendations
Fabian Przepióra, Paweł Lewandowski, Michał Ciach·The Science of The Total EnvironmentPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- An adapted typology of tree-related microhabitats including tropical forests
Ronja Nußer, Giovanni Bianco, … Jörg C. Müller·Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024