Journal of Proteome ResearchBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Deep learning accurately predicts estrogen receptor status in breast cancer metabolomics data
Abstract
Metabolomics holds the promise as a new technology to diagnose highly heterogeneous diseases. Conventionally, metabolomics data analysis for diagnosis is done using various statistical and machine learning based classification methods. However, it remains unknown if deep neural network, a class of increasingly popular machine learning methods, is suitable to classify metabolomics data. Here we use a cohort of 271 breast cancer tissues, 204 positive estrogen receptor (ER+) and 67 negative estrogen receptor (ER-), to test the accuracies of autoencoder, a deep learning (DL) framework, as well as six widely used machine learning models, namely Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees (RPART), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Prediction Analysis for Microarrays (PAM), and Generalized Boosted Models (GBM). DL framework has the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 in classifying ER+/ER-patients, compared to the other six machine learning algorithms. Furthermore, the biological interpretation of the first hidden layer reveals eight commonly enriched significant metabolomics pathways (adjusted P-value<0.05) that cannot be discovered by other machine learning methods. Among them, protein digestion & absorption and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters pathways are also confirmed in integrated analysis between metabolomics and gene expression data in these samples. In summary, deep learning method shows advantages for metabolomics based breast cancer ER status classification, with both the highest prediction accurcy (AUC=0.93) and better revelation of disease biology. We encourage the adoption of autoencoder based deep learning method in the metabolomics research community for classification.
- organism: human
- assay: metabolomics
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 245
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- End-to-End Deep Learning for Detecting Metastatic Breast Cancer in Axillary Lymph Node from Digital Pathology Images
Turki Turki, Anmar Al-Sharif, Y‐h. Taguchi·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021
- Deep Learning Allows Assessment of Risk of Metastatic Relapse from Invasive Breast Cancer Histological Slides
I. Garberis, V. Gaury, … M. Lacroix-Triki·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2022
- Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Breast Cancer Histology Image Analysis
Alexander Rakhlin, Alexey Shvets, … Alexandr A. Kalinin·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2018
- Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification: A Deep Learning Approach
Mehdi Habibzadeh Motlagh, Mahboobeh Jannesari, … Iman Hajirasouliha·bioRxiv·Jan 4, 2018
- A plasma metabolomics workflow for breast cancer detection using quantitative GC/MS and machine learning
Noriyuki Ojima, Tomonori Yokoyama, … Masataka Ikeda·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2026
- Automated machine learning and explainable AI (AutoML-XAI) for metabolomics: improving cancer diagnostics
Olatomiwa O. Bifarin, Facundo M. Fernández·Journal of the American Society for Mass SpectrometryPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2024