bioRxivEcology
Effectiveness of Joint Species Distribution Models in the Presence of Imperfect Detection
Abstract
O_LIJoint species distribution models (JSDMs) are a recent development in biogeography and enable the spatial modelling of multiple species and their interactions and dependencies. However, most models do not consider imperfect detection, which can significantly bias estimates. This is one of the first papers to account for imperfect detection when fitting data with JSDMs and to explore the complications that may arise. C_LIO_LIA multivariate probit JSDM that explicitly accounts for imperfect detection is proposed, and implemented using a Bayesian hierarchical approach. We investigate the performance of the JSDM in the presence of imperfect detection for a range of factors, including varied levels of detection and species occupancy, and varied numbers of survey sites and replications. To understand how effective this JSDM is in practice, we also compare results to those from a JSDM that does not explicitly model detection but instead makes use of "collapsed data". A case study of owls and gliders in Victoria Australia is also illustrated. C_LIO_LIUsing simulations, we found that the JSDMs explicitly accounting for detection can accurately estimate intrinsic correlation between species with enough survey sites and replications. Reducing the number of survey sites decreases the precision of estimates, while reducing the number of survey replications can lead to biased estimates. For low probabilities of detection, the model may require a large number of survey replications to remove bias from estimates. However, JSDMs not explicitly accounting for detection may have a limited ability to dis-entangle detection from occupancy, which substantially reduces their ability to accurately infer the species distribution spatially. Our case study showed positive correlation between Sooty Owls and Greater Gliders, despite a low number of survey replications. C_LIO_LITo avoid biased estimates of inter-species correlations and species distributions, imperfect detection needs to be considered. However, for low probability of detection, the JSDMs explicitly accounting for detection is data hungry. Estimates from such models may still be subject to bias. To overcome the bias, researchers need to carefully design surveys and choose appropriate modelling approaches. The survey design should ensure sufficient survey replications for unbiased inferences on species inter-dependencies and occupancy. C_LI
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Data integration with uneven spatiotemporal coverage: A point-process approach for dynamic species distribution models
Moritz Klaassen, Marc Fernández, … Tiago André Marques·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2025
- A joint distribution framework to improve presence-only species distribution models by exploiting opportunistic surveys
J. M. Escamilla Molgora, L. M. Sedda, … P. M. Atkinson·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2021
- jsdmstan: An R package for fitting joint species distribution models in Stan
Fiona M. Seaton·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2025
- Clarifying species dependence under joint speciesdistribution modeling
A. E. Gelfand, S. Shirota·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2019
- Bayesian species distribution models integrate presence-only and presence-absence data to predict deer distribution and relative abundance.
V. Morera-Pujol, P. S. Mostert, … S. Ciuti·bioRxiv·May 23, 2022
- A Multifaceted Framework To Assess tradeoffs in Performances Of Alternative JSDM
C. Violet, A. Boye, … M. P. Marzloff·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2022