International Review of Sport and Exercise PsychologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Physical exercise and motor learning: A scoping review
Layale YoussefiD, Amanda O’FarrelliD, Denis ArvisaisiD, Jason L. NevaiD, Benjamin PageauxiD
Abstract
Physical exercise can enhance motor learning by inducing neurophysiological changes that facilitate this process. This preregistered scoping review aimed to map current knowledge on the effects of physical exercise on motor learning. Experimental studies and review articles examining any form of physical exercise in healthy or clinical populations were included, with outcomes assessing motor skill acquisition and/or retention. A systematic search across eight databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO) identified 66 sources, including 62 experimental studies and 4 reviews. Two researchers independently reviewed articles and extracted data using a pretested data extraction table; disagreements at the study selection or data extraction stages were resolved through discussion with a third researcher. Most studies involved healthy populations (83%), with clinical populations underrepresented (17%). Aerobic exercise was most commonly investigated, particularly lower-limb cycling (73%), while resistance exercise was rarely examined (0.6%). Exercise intensity was predominantly high, although 6% of studies reported intensity not reflecting the prescribed method. Motor learning outcomes varied: 55% assessed both skill acquisition and retention, while 45% relied on retention tests alone at short-term or delayed time points, or both. Infrequent use of long-term retention tests limits understanding of lasting effects. Overall, this review highlights gaps in the literature, including the underrepresentation of clinical populations, inconsistent reporting of exercise intensity, scarce research on resistance exercise, and limited assessment of long-term retention, which may affect interpretation of exercises impact on motor learning. HighlightsO_LIClinical populations were underrepresented in the exercise and motor learning field. C_LIO_LIHigh-intensity lower-limb cycling was the most common exercise studied. C_LIO_LIResistance exercise was underrepresented in the field. C_LIO_LIAccurate prescription of exercise intensity is essential to ensure reliable results. C_LIO_LIFuture research should more frequently use longer-term retention tests. C_LI
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Aerobic Exercise Intensity: A Dose-Response Effect on Motor Adaptation and Learning
Nesrine Harroum, Yasmine Mahrez, … Jason L. Neva·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2025
- Experimentally induced fatigue and motor learning: A scoping review
Bahram Ghafari Goushe, Layale Youssef, … Benjamin Pageaux·NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2026
- Neuromuscular, Cardiovascular, and Cognitive Fatigue in Motor Learning: A Systematic Review
Abdellah Hassar, Jacob Lund, … Jason Bouffard·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsPeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2026
- Eccentric cycling improves motor learning more than concentric cycling
Layale Youssef, Benjamin Pageaux, Jason L. Neva·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in SportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2026
- Optimizing the Benefits of Mental Practice on Motor Acquisition and Consolidation with Moderate-Intensity Exercise
Dylan Rannaud Monany, Florent Lebon, Charalambos Papaxanthis·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Jul 18, 2023
- Motor cortical circuits are uniquely impacted by different exercise intensities
Nesrine Harroum, Amanda O’Farrell, … Jason L. Neva·bioRxiv·Jan 24, 2025