BiotropicaEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Ecological plasticity explains the distribution of sympatric and allopatric mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.) in northeastern Madagascar
Dominik SchüßleriD, Tobias van ElstiD, Naina Ratsimba RabemananjaraiD, Tahiriniaina Radriarimanga, Stephan Michel Rafamantanantsoa, Doménico Roger RandimbiharinirinaiD, Emmanuel RasolondraibeiD, Jasmin Mantilla‐ContrerasiD, Ute RadespieliD
Abstract
Species distributions are shaped by complex biotic and abiotic interactions. We studied major ecological drivers of the distribution of four cryptic mouse lemur species (Microcebus spp.) in northeastern Madagascar, across sympatric and allopatric ranges. Using structural habitat characteristics, adaptability to habitat degradation, bioclimatic niches, and morphology, we estimated n-dimensional hypervolumes of niche sizes and overlaps. Annual body mass variability was analyzed as an indicator of heterothermy, a potential indicator for ecological plasticity. M. jonahi and M. simmonsi were found almost equally often in forest- and fallow-derived habitats (52% and 58%, respectively), while M. lehilahytsara predominantly occupied fallow habitats (71%), likely driven by the coexistence with other species. M. lehilahytsara exhibited the largest niche and range size, followed by M. jonahi and M. simmonsi. In contrast, M. macarthurii was restricted to a narrow niche and range. M. jonahi and M. simmonsi displayed significant fat deposition before the austral winter, indicating heterothermy as an adaptation to unpredictable environmental conditions. These species were only found in allopatry, likely due to competition for critical resources like sleeping sites. The smaller M. lehilahytsara coexisted with M. jonahi and M. macarthurii potentially by adjusting its niche to avoid competition with these larger-bodied species. We hypothesize that heterothermy allowed M. jonahi, M. simmonsi, and M. macarthurii to persist in lowlands during Pleistocene climatic challenges but that it did not promote coexistence. In contrast, M. lehilahytsara may have lost lowland distributions due to a lower ability to store fat. Our findings require further testing but provide a plausible explanation for a complex distributional pattern of sympatric and allopatric occurrences.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 39th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Diet and feeding strategies of two sympatric mouse lemurs (Microcebus) in the xeric forests of Andohahela, southeastern Madagascar
Sam Roberts, J Carolina Segami Marzal, … Anne D. Yoder·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2026
- Species-specific responses to paleoclimatic changes and landscape barriers drive contrasting phylogeography of co-distributed lemur species in northeastern Madagascar
Tobias van Elst, Dominik Schüßler, … Ute Radespiel·Molecular EcologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2025
- Spatiotemporal microhabitat heterogeneity and dispersion patterns of two small mammals in a temperate forest
I. M. De-la-Cruz, A. Castro-Campillo, … J. Ramirez-Pulido·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2019
- Mouse lemurs and degraded habitat
Simon Knoop, Lounès Chikhi, Jordi Salmona·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2017
- Niche partitioning and coexistence of sympatric macaques in a fragmented habitat of the Upper Brahmaputra Valley, northeastern India
- Influence of vegetation structure on lemur recolonization of post-fire habitats in northwestern Madagascar
Naina Ratsimba Rabemananjara, Misa Rasolozaka, … Ute Radespiel·American Journal of PrimatologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2026