BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
DeepMAsED: Evaluating the quality of metagenomic assemblies
Olga Mineeva, Mateo Rojas-Carulla, Ruth E. LeyiD, Bernhard SchölkopfiD, Nicholas D. YoungblutiD
Abstract
Motivation/backgroundMethodological advances in metagenome assembly are rapidly increasing in the number of published metagenome assemblies. However, identifying misassemblies is challenging due to a lack of closely related reference genomes that can act as pseudo ground truth. Existing reference-free methods are no longer maintained, can make strong assumptions that may not hold across a diversity of research projects, and have not been validated on large scale metagenome assemblies.\n\nResultsWe present DeepMAsED, a deep learning approach for identifying misassembled contigs without the need for reference genomes. Moreover, we provide an in silico pipeline for generating large-scale, realistic metagenome assemblies for comprehensive model training and testing. DeepMAsED accuracy substantially exceeds the state-of-the-art when applied to large and complex metagenome assemblies. Our model estimates close to a 5% contig misassembly rate in two recent large-scale metagenome assembly publications.\n\nConclusionsDeepMAsED accurately identifies misassemblies in metagenome-assembled contigs from a broad diversity of bacteria and archaea without the need for reference genomes or strong modelling assumptions. Running DeepMAsED is straight-forward, as well as is model re-training with our dataset generation pipeline. Therefore, DeepMAsED is a flexible misassembly classifier that can be applied to a wide range of metagenome assembly projects.\n\nAvailabilityDeepMAsED is available from GitHub at https://github.com/leylabmpi/DeepMAsED.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- organism: virus
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: deep learning
- Citations
- 48
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- ResMiCo: increasing the quality of metagenome-assembled genomes with deep learning
Olga Mineeva, Daniel Danciu, … Nicholas D. Youngblut·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2023
- DeepMM: Identify and correct Metagenome Misassemblies with deep learning
- metaMIC: reference-free Misassembly Identification and Correction of de novo metagenomic assemblies
Senying Lai, Shaojun Pan, … Xing‐Ming Zhao·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2022
- Comparison between ribosomal assembly and machine learning tools for microbial identification of organisms with different characteristics
Stephanie Chau, Carlos Rojas, … William Andreopoulos·Current BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2024
- Pre-binning correction of chimeric contigs reduces reference-discordant gene annotations in near-complete metagenome-assembled genomes
- BIGMAC : Breaking Inaccurate Genomes and Merging Assembled Contigs for long read metagenomic assembly
Ka Kit Lam, Richard Hall, … Satish Rao·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2016