henhaobio
Sign in

BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

DeepMAsED: Evaluating the quality of metagenomic assemblies

Olga Mineeva, Mateo Rojas-Carulla, Ruth E. LeyiD, Bernhard SchölkopfiD, Nicholas D. YoungblutiD

PDFDOIPreprintCode

Abstract

Motivation/backgroundMethodological advances in metagenome assembly are rapidly increasing in the number of published metagenome assemblies. However, identifying misassemblies is challenging due to a lack of closely related reference genomes that can act as pseudo ground truth. Existing reference-free methods are no longer maintained, can make strong assumptions that may not hold across a diversity of research projects, and have not been validated on large scale metagenome assemblies.\n\nResultsWe present DeepMAsED, a deep learning approach for identifying misassembled contigs without the need for reference genomes. Moreover, we provide an in silico pipeline for generating large-scale, realistic metagenome assemblies for comprehensive model training and testing. DeepMAsED accuracy substantially exceeds the state-of-the-art when applied to large and complex metagenome assemblies. Our model estimates close to a 5% contig misassembly rate in two recent large-scale metagenome assembly publications.\n\nConclusionsDeepMAsED accurately identifies misassemblies in metagenome-assembled contigs from a broad diversity of bacteria and archaea without the need for reference genomes or strong modelling assumptions. Running DeepMAsED is straight-forward, as well as is model re-training with our dataset generation pipeline. Therefore, DeepMAsED is a flexible misassembly classifier that can be applied to a wide range of metagenome assembly projects.\n\nAvailabilityDeepMAsED is available from GitHub at https://github.com/leylabmpi/DeepMAsED.

Citations
48
FWCI
2.11
Field percentile
top 12%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.