bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
GGSDT: A unified signal detection framework for confidence data analysis
Abstract
Human decision behavior entails a graded awareness of its certainty, known as a feeling of confidence. Until now, considerable interest has been paid to behavioral and computational dissociations of decision and confidence, which has raised an urgent need for measurement frameworks that can quantify the efficiency of confidence rating relative to decision accuracy (metacognitive efficiency). As a unique addition to such frameworks, we have developed a new signal detection theory paradigm utilizing the generalized gaussian distribution (GGSDT). This framework evaluates the observers internal standard deviation ratio and metacognitive efficiency through the scale and shape parameters respectively. The shape parameter quantifies the kurtosis of internal distributions and can practically be understood in reference to the proportion of the gaussian ideal observers confidence being disrupted with random guessing (metacognitive lapse rate). This interpretation holds largely irrespective of the contaminating effects of decision accuracy or operating characteristic asymmetry. Thus, the GGSDT enables hitherto unexplored research protocols (e.g., direct comparison of yes/no versus forced-choice metacognitive efficiency), expected to find applications in various fields of behavioral science. This paper provides a detailed walkthrough of the GGSDT analysis with an accompanying R package (ggsdt).
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- On why we lack confidence in signal-detection-based analyses of confidence
Derek Henry Arnold, Alan Johnston, … Kielan Yarrow·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2022
- Trial-by-trial fluctuations in decision criterion shape confidence
Robin Vloeberghs, Lara Navarrete Orejudo, … Kobe Desender·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2026
- A robust measure of metacognitive sensitivity and confidence criteria
Derek Henry Arnold, Mitchell Clendinen, … Kielan Yarrow·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2023
- Quantifying metacognitive thresholds using signal-detection theory
Maxine T. Sherman, Anil K. Seth, Adam B. Barrett·bioRxiv·Jul 4, 2018
- HMeta-d: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of metacognitive efficiency from confidence ratings
S. M. Fleming·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2016
- Response-related signals increase confidence but not metacognitive performance
Elisa Filevich, Christina Koß, Nathan Faivre·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2020