NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Qoala-T: A supervised-learning tool for quality control of FreeSurfer segmented MRI data
Eduard T. KlapwijkiD, Ferdi van de Kamp, Mara van der MeuleniD, Sabine PetersiD, Lara Marise WierengaiD
Abstract
Performing quality control to detect image artifacts and data-processing errors is crucial in structural magnetic resonance imaging, especially in developmental studies. Currently, many studies rely on visual inspection by trained raters for quality control. The subjectivity of these manual procedures lessens comparability between studies, and with growing study sizes quality control is increasingly time consuming. In addition, both inter-rater as well as intra-rater variability of manual quality control is high and may lead to inclusion of poor quality scans and exclusion of scans of usable quality. In the current study we present the Qoala-T tool, which is an easy and free to use supervised-learning model to reduce rater bias and misclassification in manual quality control procedures. First, we manually rated quality of N = 784 FreeSurfer-processed T1-weighted scans. Different supervised-learning models were then compared to predict manual quality ratings. Results show that the Qoala-T tool using random forests is able to predict scan quality with both high sensitivity and specificity (mean area under the curve (AUC) = 0.98). In addition, the Qoala-T tool was also able to adequately predict the quality of a novel unseen dataset (N = 112; mean AUC = 0.95). These outcomes indicate that using Qoala-T in other datasets could greatly reduce the time needed for quality control. More importantly, this procedure could further help to reduce variability related to manual quality control, thereby benefiting the comparability of data quality between studies.
- assay: imaging
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 198
- FWCI
- 15.18
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Segmentation-Based Quality Control of Structural Magnetic Resonance Images
Robert Dahnke, Polona Kalc, … Christian Gaser B·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2025
- QRATER: a collaborative and centralized imaging quality control web-based application.
Sofia Fernandez‐Lozano, Mahsa Dadar, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Aperture NeuroPeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2024
- Using Outliers in Freesurfer Segmentation Statistics to Identify Cortical Reconstruction Errors in Structural Scans
Abigail B. Waters, Ryan A. Mace, … David A. Gansler·Brain Imaging and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2018
- Visual QC Protocol for FreeSurfer Cortical Parcellations from Anatomical MRI
Pradeep Reddy Raamana, Athena E. Theyers, … Stephen C. Strother·Aperture NeuroPeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2022
- MRIQC: Advancing the Automatic Prediction of Image Quality in MRI from Unseen Sites
Oscar Estéban, Daniel Birman, … Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2017
- Deep learning of quality control for stereotaxic registration of human brain MRI
Vladimir Fonov, Mahsa Dadar, D. Louis Collins·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2018