bioRxivEcologyPreprint
The dilemma of underestimating freshwater biodiversity: morphological and molecular approaches
A. Schoenle, D. Scepanski, A. Floss, P. Buechel, A.-K. Koblitz, A. Scherwass, H. Arndt, A.-M. Waldvogel
Abstract
BackgroundThe Lower Rhine ecosystem has been extensively shaped by human activities, destroying, modifying, and even creating novel water bodies as habitats. Freshwater systems are hotspots of biodiversity and highly complex ecosystems. However, knowledge and description of its biodiversity across all trophic levels is still incomplete and the complexity of interactions remains unresolved, especially below the micro scale. This is even true for important international inland waterways such as the River Rhine. We here document the biodiversity of the Lower Rhine and associated water bodies, spanning from the level of protists up to the level of larger invertebrate predators and herbivores organized in faunal size classes (nano-, micro, meio- and macrofauna). This study is part of a long-term ecological research project (LTER-D REES). Our study includes two riprap sections of the rivers main channel, two oxbows and two gravel-pit lakes in the rivers flood plain. Diversity was assessed through morphotype richness and metabarcoding, as well as accounting for sediment composition. ResultsWe found high discrepancies between amplicon sequencing variants (ASVs) and morphotype richness in all size classes, as well as a problematic limitation of reference sequences from freshwater organisms in public databases. Irrespective of the size class, we observed habitat specific zoobenthos communities in each of the three investigated habitat types, with few taxa or taxonomic groups overlapping. ConclusionsOur results demonstrate the importance to integrate different methodologies and extend freshwater sequencing efforts for the assessment of biodiversity across all trophic levels, as particularly relevant for long term projects.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of eDNA, bulk-sample metabarcoding, and morphological approaches: A case study of riverine benthic macroinvertebrate communities
A. D. Larano, S. Yaegashi, … K. Watanabe·bioRxiv·May 30, 2023
- Comparing morphological and molecular methods for stream macroinvertebrate biodiversity assessment across seven watersheds in the southern United States
Daniel C. Allen, Zacchaeus G. Compson, … Yang Hong·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2026
- Comparison of DNA metabarcoding and morphological identification for stream macroinvertebrate biodiversity assessment and monitoring
J. M. Serrana, Y. Miyake, … K. Watanabe·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2018
- Planktonic Protist Biodiversity and Biogeography in Lakes From Four Brazilian River-Floodplain Systems
G. Lentendu, P. R. B. Buosi, … M. Dunthorn·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2018
- Hidden diversity - DNA metabarcoding reveals hyper-diverse benthic invertebrate communities
J. E. Gleason, R. H. Hanner, K. Cottenie·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2022
- Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species
Till‐Hendrik Macher, Robin Schütz, … Florian Leese·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2021