bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Gametic selection and mating systems show mutually dependent evolution
Abstract
Competition among pollen or sperm (gametic selection) can cause evolution. Mating systems shape the intensity of gametic selection by determining the competitors involved, which can in turn cause mating system evolution. We model the bidirectional relationship between gametic selection and mating systems, focussing on variation in female mating frequency (monandry-polyandry) and self-fertilisation (selfing-outcrossing). First, we find that mating systems affect evolutionary responses to gametic selection, with more effective gametic selection when fertilisation success depends on haploid genotypes, rather than the diploid genotype of the father. Monandry and selfing both reduce the efficacy of gametic selection despite creating intense selection among pollen/sperm from heterozygous males with haploid expression. This effect means selfing can increase mutation load, in contrast to classic predictions where selfing purges deleterious mutations. Second, we show that mating systems can evolve via their effect on gametic selection, with polyandry evolving because it removes deleterious alleles more efficiently and increases offspring fitness. Our population genetic models reveal that this good sperm effect could plausibly give a selective advantage for polyandry over monandry of only around 1%. Selection for polyandry is lessened further if some loci experience balancing selection and is likely to be overwhelmed by any direct fitness effects of mating systems. Similarly, the indirect benefits from manipulating gametic selection have a weak influence on the evolution of selfing, which is dominated by automatic selection and inbreeding depression in our model. Nevertheless, gametic selection can be potentially decisive for selfing evolution because it significantly reduces inbreeding depression, which favours selfing. One test of the predicted interactions between gametic selection and mating system evolution would be to compare evolutionary rates in genes with different expression patterns across different mating systems.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Selection for pollen competitive ability in mixed mating systems
M. A. E. Peters, A. E. Weis·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2018
- The evolution of condition-dependent self-fertilisation
Thomas Lesaffre, John R. Pannell, Charles Mullon·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2026
- Polygenic selection to a changing optimum under self-fertilisation
M. Hartfield, S. Glemin·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2022
- The evolution of recombination in self-fertilizing organisms
R. Stetsenko, D. Roze·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2022
- Too attractive to self: How pollinators can interfere with the evolution of selfing.
R. B. Spigler, L. Smith-Ramesh, S. Kalisz·bioRxiv·May 21, 2020
- Adaptive Reduction of Male Gamete Number in a Selfing Species
T. Tsuchimatsu, H. Kakui, … K. K. Shimizu·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2018