bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Environmental RNA/DNA Metabarcoding for Ecological Risk Assessment of Chemicals Based on Response of Benthic Communities in Natural Environments
Yasuaki InoueiD, Kaede MiyataiD, Masayuki Yamane, Hiroshi HondaiD
Abstract
To achieve the current Nature Positive goals, it is important to identify the effects of chemicals on ecosystems and strategically reduce their risks. We therefore estimated the safe concentration (SC) of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) by investigating the relationship between benthic communities detected via environmental RNA (eRNA) and environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding and the water quality in a river contaminated with LAS. Non-metric multidimensional scaling of benthic communities detected via eRNA indicated significant differences between contaminated and non-contaminated sites, and redundancy analysis showed significant correlation between the benthic communities and LAS concentration. These results demonstrate that eRNA is more sensitive than eDNA for capturing the community changes that result from LAS contamination. No significant differences were observed in biodiversity indices between the highest LAS concentration site and non-contaminated site; thus, the SC was estimated at >47 {micro}g/L. The results suggest that, although hazard assessment using the assessment factor (AF) leads to conservative estimation of the effects of chemicals because the predicted no-effect concentration in previous studies is lower than the SC, hazard assessment based on the response of biological communities using eRNA metabarcoding can refine such ecological assessments, developing the environmental management standards to achieve nature-positive goals.
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Environmental nucleic acids: a field-based comparison for monitoring freshwater habitats using eDNA and eRNA
J. E. Littlefair, M. D. Rennie, M. E. Cristescu·bioRxiv·Dec 1, 2021
- Can carcasses cause environmental nucleic acid pollution? Implications for interpreting environmental RNA/DNA survey results
Yasuaki Inoue, Kaede Miyata, … Hiroshi Honda·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2026
- Freshwater fish community assessment using eDNA metabarcoding vs. capture-based methods: differences in efficiency and resolution coupled to habitat and ecology
Manuel Curto, Sofia Batista, … Hugo F. Gante·Environmental ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2025
- Complementary Insights from Environmental DNA and Environmental RNA Metabarcoding for Marine Biodiversity Assessment Around San Andres Island, Colombia
Sean Kyle Bedingfield, Caroline Vanegas Moreno, Alexander More·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2026
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding as an effective and rapid tool for fish monitoring in canals
A. D. McDevitt, N. Guimaraes Sales, … C. Benvenuto·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2018
- DNA metabarcoding potentially reveals multi-assemblage eutrophication responses in an eastern North American river
Joseph M. Craine, Matthew V. Cannon, … Noah Fierer·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2017