Lecture notes in computer scienceBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Evaluation of domain adaptation approaches for robust classification of heterogeneous biological data sets
Abstract
Most machine learning algorithms require that training data are identically distributed to ensure effective learning. In biological studies, however, even small variations in the experimental setup can lead to substantial deviations. Domain adaptation offers tools to deal with this problem. It is particularly useful for cases where only a small amount of training data is available in the domain of interest, while a large amount of training data is available in a different, but relevant domain.\n\nWe investigated to what extent domain adaptation was able to improve prediction accuracy for complex biological data. To that end, we used simulated data and time-lapse movies of differentiating blood stem cells in different cell cycle stages from multiple experiments and compared three commonly used domain adaptation approaches. EasyAdapt, a simple technique of structured pooling of related data sets, was able to improve accuracy when classifying the simulated data and cell cycle stages from microscopic images. Meanwhile, the technique proved robust to the potential negative impact on the classification accuracy that is common in other techniques that build models with heterogeneous data. Despite its implementation simplicity, EasyAdapt consistently produced more accurate predictions compared to conventional techniques.\n\nDomain adaptation is therefore able to substantially reduce the amount of work required to create a large amount of annotated training data in the domain of interest necessary whenever the domain changes even a little, which is common not only in biological experiments, but universally exists in almost all data collection routines.
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- assay: imaging
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.10
- Field percentile
- 36th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Class-imbalanced Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation for Histopathology Images
M. Hosseini, A. Shafique, … H. Tizhoosh·bioRxiv·Mar 8, 2023
- scAdapt: Virtual adversarial domain adaptation network for single cell RNA-seq data classification across platforms and species
Xiang Zhou, Hua Chai, … Yuedong Yang·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2021
- From shallow to deep: exploiting feature-based classifiers for domain adaptation in semantic segmentation
Alex Matskevych, Adrian Wolny, … Anna Kreshuk·Frontiers in Computer SciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2022
- Tissue-specific transfer-learning enables retasking of a general comprehensive model to a specific domain
Qing Li, Deshan Perera, … Quan Long·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2023
- Cell segmentation without annotation by unsupervised domain adaptation based on cooperative self-learning
Shintaro Miyaki, Takashi Morikura, … Akira Funahashi·IEEE AccessPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- MACS: Multi-Domain Adaptation Enables Accurate Connectomics Segmentation
Abrar Rahman Abir, Anik Kumar Saha, Md. Shamsuzzoha Bayzid·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2025