bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
OncoGenRAG: Evidence-Grounded Retrieval and BioBERT Classification for Precision Oncology Variant Interpretation
Abstract
The increasing use of tumor sequencing has intensified the need for fast, traceable interpretation of genomic variants. General-purpose large language models can produce fluent answers, but unsupported statements, weak provenance, and stale knowledge limit their suitability for clinical genomics. We developed OncoGenRAG, a research framework that combines a parameter-efficiently fine-tuned BioBERT classifier with an entity-aware retrieval system over a curated, multi-source oncology knowledge base. The reported knowledge base contains 933 harmonized records derived from CIViC, ClinVar/dbSNP, Open Targets, UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, Ensembl Variation, and linked PubMed literature. The classifier assigns one of five labels: Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, Variant of Uncertain Significance, Benign, or Oncogenic; the retrieval component ranks evidence records using subword TF-IDF similarity and explicit gene, variant, and cancer-type matches. A rejection rule suppresses answers when retrieval support is below a prespecified threshold. In the authors held-out evaluation, the classifier achieved 92.40% accuracy, 93.15% weighted precision, 92.40% weighted recall, and 92.65% weighted F1 score. In a separate benchmark of 100 clinical-style queries, OncoGenRAG achieved reported Precision@1 of 94.5%, Precision@3 of 96.8%, and 100% database grounding. No hallucinated answer was observed under the study operational definition, compared with a 41.0% no-hallucination rate for the ungrounded baseline. These results should be interpreted as internal validation rather than proof of universal safety because query construction, annotator agreement, class-specific performance, calibration, and external validation data were not available for independent analysis. OncoGenRAG provides a transparent design for evidence retrieval and abstention, but it is a research prototype and must not be used to select treatment without expert review.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cosine Similarity Conflates Clinically Distinct Cancer Variants: A Case for Typed-Graph Retrieval in Precision Oncology Decision Support
Umair Ahmed Khan·bioRxiv·May 17, 2026
- Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI): oncogenicity guidelines implementation to support somatic variants interpretation in precision oncology
Maria Giulia Carta, Lars Tögel, … Fulvia Ferrazzi·Journal of Molecular DiagnosticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2026
- From Text to Translation: Using Language Models to Prioritize Variants for Clinical Review
Weijiang Li, Xiaomin Li, … Christopher A. Cassa·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 19, 2026
- Variomes: a high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants
Emilie Pasche, Anaïs Mottaz, … Patrick Ruch·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2022
- Resources For Interpreting Variants In Precision Genomic Oncology Applications
Hsinyi Tsang, KanakaDurga Addepalli, Sean R. Davis·Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2017
- A harmonized meta-knowledgebase of clinical interpretations of cancer genomic variants
Alex Handler Wagner, Brian Walsh, … Adam A. Margolin·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2020