bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Using Community Science and eDNA to Inform a State-Designed Marine Protected Area Monitoring Program: A Case Study from Malibu, California
Tanner WatersiD, Zachary J. GoldiD, Emily Parker, Olivia Simon, Liam JennyiD, Richard F. AmbroseiD, Paul Henry BarberiD, Robert A. EagleiD
Abstract
Management of marine protected areas (MPAs) require long-term monitoring and evaluation that is often limited by the cost and effort of conventional visual based surveys. We evaluated a community science-based eDNA approach to MPA monitoring over two years in the Point Dume State Marine Reserve, the Point Dume State Marine Conservation Area, and two paired unprotected reference sites. Across the sampling period, we detected 119 species of fish and marine mammals, including 19 of the 22 regional management-priority species for Southern CA MPAs. Protected and unprotected comparison sites were broadly similar in overall assemblage with 93 species shared across all sites. Multivariate analyses revealed site-level differences, although season and year explained more variation than protection status. Species presence also shifted during a La-Nina transition, highlighting the importance of long-term monitoring under different climatological contexts. Community scientists greatly expanded the temporal and spatial scope of eDNA sampling and generated high-quality data. Subsampling analysis showed that quarterly sampling, with three sample replicates and sequencing depths between 700k-990k, recovered 95% of observed biodiversity of the full time series. These results demonstrate that a community science-based eDNA program could provide a standardized, scalable, low-cost, and management-relevant approach for long-term monitoring across California's MPA network.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas
Zachary J. Gold, Joshua L. Sprague, … Paul Henry Barber·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 24, 2021
- Beach environmental DNA fills gaps in photographic biomonitoring to track spatiotemporal community turnover across 82 phyla
R. S. Meyer, T. M. Schweizer, … R. K. Wayne·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2019
- Beyond traditional biodiversity fish monitoring: environmental DNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual census detect different sets of a complex fish community at a marine biodiversity hotspot
Tania Valdivia‐Carrillo, Axayácatl Rocha‐Olivares, … Adrián Munguía‐Vega·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2019
- Utility of Occupancy Models with Environmental DNA (eDNA) fromOlympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary
Christopher Paight, Jenny Waddell, Matthew P. Galaska·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2021
- Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring: A multi-technique and multi-trophic approach to investigate cetacean distribution and feeding ecology
Luís Afonso, Joana Costa, … Catarina Magalhães·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2024
- Investigating temporal and spatial variation of eDNA in a nearshore rocky reef environment
T. Ely, P. H. Barber, Z. Gold·bioRxiv·Dec 29, 2020