henhaobio
Sign in

Nucleic Acids ResearchGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

Predicting gene expression from histone marks using chromatin deep learning models depends on histone mark function, regulatory distance and cellular states

Alan E MurphyiD, Aydan Askarova, Boris LenhardiD, Nathan SkeneiD, Sarah J. MarziiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

To understand the complex relationship between histone mark activity and gene expression, recent advances have used in silico predictions based on large-scale machine learning models. However, these approaches have omitted key contributing factors like cell state, histone mark function or distal effects, that impact the relationship, limiting their findings. Moreover, downstream use of these models for new biological insight is lacking. Here, we present the most comprehensive study of this relationship to date - investigating seven histone marks, in eleven cell types, across a diverse range of cell states. We used convolutional and attention-based models to predict transcription from histone mark activity at promoters and distal regulatory elements. Our work shows that histone mark function, genomic distance and cellular states collectively influence a histone marks relationship with transcription. We found that no individual histone mark is consistently the strongest predictor of gene expression across all genomic and cellular contexts. This highlights the need to consider all three factors when determining the effect of histone mark activity on transcriptional state. Furthermore, we conducted in silico histone mark perturbation assays, uncovering functional and disease related loci and highlighting frameworks for the use of chromatin deep learning models to uncover new biological insight. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=179 SRC="FIGDIR/small/587323v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18dfcbcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cba6b8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2eb0ceorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@159d5b7_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Citations
10
FWCI
1.36
Field percentile
top 19%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISDevadas '15Singh '18Zeng '19Wen '24Liu '22Avelli '26
69% semantic matchGenetics
Lalita Devadas, Angela Yen, Manolis Kellis·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2015