Imaging NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Generation of surrogate brain maps preserving spatial autocorrelation through random rotation of geometric eigenmodes
Nikitas C. KoussisiD, James Christopher S. PangiD, Richa PhogatiD, Jayson JeganathaniD, Bryan K. PatoniD, Alex FornitoiD, Peter A. RobinsoniD, Bratislav MišićiD, Michael J BreakspeariD
Abstract
The brain expresses activity in complex spatiotemporal patterns, reflected in the influence of spatially distributed cytoarchitectural, biochemical, and genetic properties. The correspondence between these multimodal "brain maps" may reflect underlying causal pathways and is hence a topic of substantial interest. However, these maps possess intrinsic smoothness (spatial autocorrelation, SA) which can inflate spurious cross-correlations, leading to false positive associations. Identifying true associations requires knowledge about the distribution of correlations that arise by chance in the presence of SA. This null distribution can be generated from an ensemble of surrogate brain maps that preserve the intrinsic SA but break the correlations between maps. The present work introduces the "eigenstrapping" method, which uses a spectral decomposition of cortical and subcortical surfaces in terms of geometric eigenmodes, and then randomly rotating these modes to produce SA-preserving surrogate brain maps. It is shown that these surrogates appropriately represent the null distribution of chance pairwise correlations, with similar or superior false positive control to current state-of-the-art procedures. Eigenstrapping is fast, eschews the need for parametric assumptions about the nature of a maps SA, and works with maps defined on smooth surfaces with or without a boundary. Moreover, it generalizes to broader classes of null models than existing techniques, offering a unified approach for inference on cortical and subcortical maps, spatiotemporal processes, and complex patterns possessing higher-order correlations.
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 12.61
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Generative modeling of brain maps with spatial autocorrelation
Joshua B. Burt, Markus Helmer, … John D. Murray·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2020
- The effect of spherical projection on spin tests for brain maps
Vincent Bazinet, Zhen-Qi Liu, Bratislav Mišić·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- The impact of heterogeneous spatial autocorrelation on comparisons of brain maps
Robert Leech, JS Smallwood, … František Váša·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2024
- Comparing spatial null models for brain maps
Ross D. Markello, Bratislav Mišić·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Apr 19, 2021
- The correspondence problem: which brain maps are significantly similar?
Aaron F. Alexander‐Bloch, Haochang Shou, … Armin Raznahan·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2018
- PaSTA: Fast parametric inference of significance for spatial associations between brain maps
Yuanzhe Liu, Andrew Zalesky·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2026