Asymmetric evolvability leads to specialization without trade-offs

Abstract

Many ideas about the evolution of specialization rely on trade-offs--an inability for one organism to express maximal performance in two or more environments. However, optimal foraging theory suggests that populations can evolve specialization on a superior resource without explicit trade-offs. Classical results in population genetics show that the process of adaptation can be biased toward further improvement in already productive environments, potentially widening the gap between superior and inferior resources. Here I synthesize these approaches with new insights on evolvability at low recombination rates, showing that emergent asymmetries in evolvability can push a population toward specialization in the absence of trade-offs. Simulations are used to demonstrate how adaptation to a more common environment interferes with adaptation to a less common but otherwise equal alternative environment. Shaped by recombination rates and other population-genetic parameters, this process results in either the retention of a generalist niche without trade-offs or entrapment at the local optimum of specialization on the common environment. These modeling results predict that transient differences in evolvability across traits during an episode of adaptation could have long-term consequences for a populations niche.