bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Conflicting binocular input triggers inhibition followed by rebound, explaining paradoxically fast reaction times
Gábor HorváthiD, János Radó, András CzigleriD, Diána Fülöp, S. Zoltán, Ilona KovácsiD, Péter BuzásiD, Gábor JandóiD
Abstract
Binocular vision depends on the integration of matching visual features across the two eyes, while conflicting interocular signals can engage active inhibitory processes in the visual system. To investigate the temporal dynamics of these putative inhibitory processes, we examined how transitions between different binocular correlation states influence perceptual detectability and response speed. Using dynamic random-dot correlograms - free of monocular cues and allowing precise interocular manipulation - we presented brief target intervals embedded in longer background sequences. Stimuli varied in binocular correlation: correlated (C) patterns contained identical luminance profiles in both eyes, anticorrelated (A) patterns had inverted luminance dots, and uncorrelated (U) patterns had independent dot arrangements. Across three experiments, we measured (1) the presentation duration threshold required to detect a change in correlation, (2) simple reaction times (RTs) to the same transitions at suprathreshold levels, and (3) psychometric functions across durations for selected transitions. In Experiment 1, A[->]C transitions yielded significantly higher duration thresholds than C[->]A, indicating a suppressive influence associated with prior anticorrelation. In contrast, Experiment 2 showed that A[->]C transitions produced the shortest RTs, while C[->]U transitions were slowest, suggesting a rebound-like facilitation following prior suppression. Experiment 3 confirmed these temporal and contrast dependences, with opposite changes in contrast threshold and reaction times between transitions toward and away from the correlated fusional states. This divergence between perceptual onset and reaction time is consistent with a two-phase account in which binocular anticorrelation is associated with an initial suppressive phase followed by rebound-like facilitation that accelerates responses once the target becomes detectable. These findings are consistent with current models of binocular rivalry and fusion, and provide a temporally resolved behavioral perspective on how inhibitory control in sensory systems may dynamically influence subsequent responsiveness under conditions of perceptual ambiguity.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Adaptation to transients disrupts spatial coherence in binocular rivalry
Marnix Naber, Sjoerd Stuit, … Chris L. E. Paffen·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2020
- Binocular Integration Manifests as a Transient Spiking Increase Followed by Selective Suppression in Primary Visual Cortex
Michele A. Cox, Kacie Dougherty, … Alexander Maier·bioRxiv·May 10, 2018
- Hierarchical and fine-scale mechanisms of binocular rivalry for conscious perception
Chencan Qian, Zihao Zhang, … Peng Zhang·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2025
- Fixation shifts in a novel 'no-report' binocular rivalry paradigm induce saccade-related perceptual switches
Ege Kingir, Ryo Segawa, … Melanie Wilke·Consciousness and CognitionPeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2025
- Attention induced perceptual traveling waves in binocular rivalry
João V.X. Cardoso, Hsin-Hung Li, … Laura Dugué·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Oct 10, 2025
- Cortical responses to conflicting binocular stimuli in mouse primary visual cortex
Daniel P. Montgomery, Daniel A. Bowen, … Eric D. Gaier·bioRxiv·Dec 31, 2024