bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Environmental DNA enables rapid detection of invasive coypu and complements camera trapping
Cyrielle BallesteriD, Simon LacombeiD, Sébastien DevillardiD, Louise d'Hollande, Yann Raulet, Vincent Sablain, Geoffrey Didier, Raphaël MathevetiD, Claude MiaudiD, Clément Oyon, Sebastien Richarte, Serge Rouvière, Alice ValentiniiD, Nathalie Vazzoler, Olivier GiméneziD
Abstract
Effective management of invasive species requires surveillance methods that reliably detect populations while minimizing field effort. Environmental DNA (eDNA) offers a potentially rapid alternative to conventional monitoring, but direct comparisons with other non-invasive methods remain limited for invasive mammals. Here, we compared eDNA water sampling and camera trapping for detecting established populations of coypu (Myocastor coypus), an invasive semi-aquatic rodent. Using replicated data collected across Mediterranean river systems in southern France, we estimated detection probabilities conditional on coypu presence using Bayesian generalized linear mixed models and quantified the sampling effort required to achieve high cumulative detection probability. Detection probability was 93.0% (95% credible interval: 72.1-98.9%) for a single eDNA water sample, compared with 52.8% (22.6-91.1%) for 30 camera-trap days, with a 96.9% posterior probability that eDNA detection was higher. Two eDNA samples were sufficient to achieve a median cumulative detection probability above 95%, compared with four 30-day camera-trapping periods. Detection also varied at different spatial scales, with camera-trap detectability being heterogeneous among local camera locations and eDNA detectability varying more among catchments. These results show that eDNA provides a rapid and reliable approach for confirming the presence of established coypu populations, while camera traps provide complementary information on activity, behaviour and habitat use. Combining rapid eDNA screening with targeted camera trapping may therefore provide an efficient surveillance strategy for invasive semi-aquatic mammals.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Improving the monitoring of the invasive Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus): combining environmental DNA and citizen observations
Erwan Delrieu‐Trottin, Mathieu Bianic, … Stéphanie Manel·Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Comparative efficiency of eDNA, camera traps and scat surveys to detect a semi-aquatic mammal across multiple catchments
Simon Lacombe, Sébastien Devillard, … Olivier Giménez·Animal ConservationPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2026
- Matching a snail's pace: Successful use of environmental DNA techniques to detect early stages of invasion by the destructive New Zealand mud snail
J. D. Woodell, M. Neiman, E. P. Levri·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2020
- Targeted and passive environmental DNA approaches outperform established methods for detection of quagga mussels, Dreissena rostriformis bugensis in flowing water
Rosetta C. Blackman, Kar Keun Sean Ling, … Lori Lawson Handley·Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Oct 29, 2020
- Species ecology, behavior, and substrate type shape eDNA detection of mammals at savanna waterholes
Irmgard Sedlmayr, Janine R. Baxter, … Tamara Schenekar·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2026
- A comparison of eDNA to camera trapping for assessment of terrestrial mammal diversity
K. Leempoel, T. Hebert, E. A. Hadly·bioRxiv·May 10, 2019