Genetics Selection EvolutionGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Optimisation of the core subset for the APY approximation of genomic relationships
Ivan PocrnićiD, Finn LindgreniD, Daniel J. TolhurstiD, William O. Herring, Gregor GorjanciD
Abstract
BackgroundBy entering the era of mega-scale genomics, we are facing many computational issues with standard genomic evaluation models due to their dense data structure and cubic computational complexity. Several scalable approaches have have been proposed to address this challenge, like the Algorithm for Proven and Young (APY). In APY, genotyped animals are partitioned into core and non-core subsets, which induces a sparser inverse of genomic relationship matrix. The partitioning into subsets is often done at random. While APY is a good approximation of the full model, the random partitioning can make results unstable, possibly affecting accuracy or even reranking animals. Here we present a stable optimisation of the core subset by choosing animals with the most informative genotype data. MethodsWe derived a novel algorithm for optimising the core subset based on the conditional genomic relationship matrix or the conditional SNP genotype matrix. We compared accuracy of genomic predictions with different core subsets on simulated and real pig data. The core subsets were constructed (1) at random, (2) based on the diagonal of genomic relationship matrix, (3) at random with weights from (2), or (4) based on the novel conditional algorithm. To understand the different core subset constructions, we have visualised population structure of genotyped animals with the linear Principal Component Analysis and the non-linear Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection. ResultsAll core subset constructions performed equally well when the number of core animals captured most of variation in genomic relationships, both in simulated and real data. When the number of core animals was not optimal, there was substantial variability in results with the random construction and no variability with the conditional construction. Visualisation of population structure and chosen core animals showed that the conditional construction spreads core animals across the whole domain of genotyped animals in a repeatable manner. ConclusionsOur results confirm that the size of the core subset in APY is critical. The results further show that the core subset can be optimised with the conditional algorithm that achieves a good and repeatable spread of core animals across the domain of genotyped animals.
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: genome assembly
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Field percentile
- top 25%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The algorithm for proven and young (APY) from a different perspective
Mohammad Ali Nilforooshan·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2022
- Is single-step genomic REML with the algorithm for proven and young more computationally efficient when less generations of data are present?
Vinícius Silva Junqueira, Daniela A. L. Lourenco, … I. Misztal·Journal of Animal SciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2022
- Combining genetic resources and elite material populations to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction in apple
Xabi Cazenave, Bernard Petit, … Hélène Muranty·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2021
- The accuracy and bias of single-step genomic prediction for populationsunder selection
Wan‐Ling Hsu, Dorian J. Garrick, Rohan L. Fernando·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2017
- Estimation Of Genomic Prediction Accuracy From Reference Populations With Varying Degrees Of Relationship
Sang Lee, Sam Clark, Julius H. J. van der Werf·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2017
- Optimizing genomic selection: A comparison of SNP selection strategies for reduced-density panels in beef cattle
Adebisi R. Ogunbawo, Henrique A. Mulim, … Hinayah Rojas de Oliveira·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2026