Human Molecular GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Annotations capturing cell-type-specific TF binding explain a large fraction of disease heritability
Bryce van de GeijniD, Hilary K. FinucaneiD, Steven GazaliD, Farhad HormozdiariiD, Tiffany AmariutaiD, Xuanyao LiuiD, Alexander GuseviD, Po‐Ru LohiD, Yakir ReshefiD, Gleb KichaeviD, Soumya RaychaudhuriiD, Alkes L. PriceiD
Abstract
It is widely known that regulatory variation plays a major role in complex disease and that cell-type-specific binding of transcription factors (TF) is critical to gene regulation, but genomic annotations from directly measured TF binding information are not currently available for most cell-type-TF pairs. Here, we construct cell-type-specific TF binding annotations by intersecting sequence-based TF binding predictions with cell-type-specific chromatin data; this strategy addresses both the limitation that identical sequences may be bound or unbound depending on surrounding chromatin context, and the limitation that sequence-based predictions are generally not cell-type-specific. We evaluated different combinations of sequence-based TF predictions and chromatin data by partitioning the heritability of 49 diseases and complex traits (average N=320K) using stratified LD score regression with the baseline-LD model (which is not cell-type-specific). We determined that 100bp windows around MotifMap sequenced-based TF binding predictions intersected with a union of six cell-type-specific chromatin marks (imputed using ChromImpute) performed best, with an 58% increase in heritability enrichment compared to the chromatin marks alone (11.6x vs 7.3x; P = 9 x 10-14 for difference) and a 12% increase in cell-type-specific signal conditional on annotations from the baseline-LD model (P = 8 x 10-11 for difference). Our results show that intersecting sequence-based TF predictions with cell-type-specific chromatin information can help refine genome-wide association signals.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 19
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Field percentile
- top 22%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- IMPACT: Genomic annotation of cell-state-specific regulatory elements inferred from the epigenome of bound transcription factors
Tiffany Amariuta, Yang Luo, … Soumya Raychaudhuri·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2019
- Inferring causal cell types of human diseases and risk variants from candidate regulatory elements
Artem Kim, Zixuan Zhang, … Steven Gazal·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2026
- CATaN maps gene regulatory programs that shape genetic risk across complex diseases
Haruka Takahashi, Hiroaki Hatano, … Kazuyoshi Ishigaki·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2026
- Detecting genome-wide directional effects of transcription factor binding on polygenic disease risk
Yakir Reshef, Hilary K. Finucane, … Alkes L. Price·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2018
- Cell Type Specific DNA Signatures of Transcription Factor Binding
Aseel Awdeh, Marcel Turcotte, Theodore J. Perkins·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2022
- Explainable models using transcription factor binding and epigenome patterns at promoters reveal disease-associated genes and their regulators in the context of cell-types
Omkar Chandra, Durjay Pramanik, … Vibhor Kumar·bioRxiv·May 6, 2024