bioRxivEcology
Preventing extinction in an age of species migration and planetary change
E. J. Lundgren, A. D. Wallach, J.-C. Svenning, M. Schlaepfer, A. L. A. Andersson, D. Ramp
Abstract
International and national conservation policies almost exclusively focus on conserving species in their historic native ranges, thus excluding species that have dispersed on their own accord or have been introduced by people. Given that many of these migrant species are threatened in their native ranges, conservation goals that explicitly exclude these migrant populations may overlook opportunities to prevent extinctions and respond dynamically to rapidly changing environmental and climatic conditions. Focusing on terrestrial mammals, we quantified the extent to which migration, in this case via introductions, has provided new homes for threatened mammal species. We then devised alternative scenarios for the inclusion of migrant populations in mainstream conservation policy with the aim of preventing global species extinctions and used spatial prioritization algorithms to simulate how these scenarios could change global spatial conservation priorities. We found that 22% of all identified migrant mammals (70 species) are threatened in their native ranges, mirroring the 25% of all mammals that are threatened. Reassessing global threat statuses by combining native and migrant ranges reduced the threat status of 23 species ([~]33% of threatened migrants). Thus, including migrant populations in threat assessments provides a more accurate assessment of actual global extinction risk among species. Spatial prioritization simulations showed that reimagining the role of migrant populations to prevent global species extinction could increase the importance of overlooked landscapes, particularly in central Australia. Our results indicate that these various and non-exhaustive ways to consider migrant populations, with due consideration for potential conservation conflicts with resident taxa, may provide unprecedented opportunities to prevent species extinctions. We present these alternatives and spatial simulations to stimulate discussion on how conservation ought to respond, both pragmatically and ethically, to rapid environmental change in order to best prevent extinctions.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A synthesis on alien mammals threatened in their native range
L. Tedeschi, B. Lenzner, … F. Essl·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2024
- Over-the-horizon extinction risk assessment reveals rapidly shifting geographic and taxonomic priorities for conservation
Alex Slavenko, Marcel Cardillo, … Ben C. Scheele·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2026
- Targeted expansion of Protected Areas to maximise the persistence of terrestrial mammals
S. Mogg, C. Fastre, … P. Visconti·bioRxiv·Aug 2, 2019
- Prioritize diversity or declining species? Trade-offs and synergies in spatial planning for the conservation of migratory birds in the face of land cover change
S. Wilson, R. Schuster, … P. Arcese·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2019
- Optimizing the conservation of migratory species over their full annual cycle
R. Schuster, S. Wilson, … J. Bennett·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2018
- Spatial distribution and hotspots of mammals in Canada
V. Cameron, A. L. Hargreaves·bioRxiv·Jan 29, 2020