OikosEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Trapped in the web: network architectures spread coevolution and shape adaptation
Alexandre Fuster‐CalvoiD, Cecilia Siliansky de AndreazziiD, Christine E. ParentiD, François MassoliD, Paulo R. GuimarãesiD, Dominique GraveliD
Abstract
Adaptation is critical for biodiversity to persist under global change. Within ecological communities, species often face trade-offs between adapting to shifting abiotic conditions and navigating the complex selective pressures imposed by interaction networks. We hypothesize that network architectures characterized by high interaction diversity and overlap constrain coevolutionary dynamics, with asymmetric outcomes for exploiters and victims. Specifically, we predict that exploiters, subject to spread and conflicting selection imposed by their victims, will evolve more slowly and show reduced capacity to track victims evolutionary responses, with these constraints strongest for generalist exploiters. In contrast, victims will show more variable dynamics depending on the coherence of selection (i.e., whether pressures from different exploiters push the victims trait in the same vs. different directions). To test this, we simulated trait evolution in coevolving communities of exploiters and victims across 91 empirical networks, and in artificial networks designed to isolate specific structural effects. Our results show that higher connectance, species richness, nestedness, and centrality homogenize biotic effects and increase fluctuations in trait matching, ultimately weakening coevolutionary coupling. Under these conditions, exploiters face conflicting selection that slows evolution, whereas victims either benefit from aligned selection that accelerates evolution or are constrained by multiple pressures. Together, our findings suggest that network architecture plays a fundamental role in shaping coevolution and adaptation, and raises broader questions about its influence on eco-evolutionary processes in more complex and environmentally variable systems.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 22th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The joint role of coevolutionary selection and network structure in shaping trait complementarity in mutualisms.
F. Pedraza, J. Bascompte·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2021
- Island Biogeography Theory of coevolution in pollination networks
Irina Birskis‐Barros, Justin Douglas Yeakel·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2025
- Cultural Selection Shapes Network Structure
- Adaptive rewiring and temperature tolerance shape the architecture of plant-pollinator networks globally
Gaurav Baruah, Meike J. Wittmann·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2025
- The role of indirect effects in coevolution as mutualism transitions into antagonism
F. Pedraza, H. Liu, … J. Bascompte·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2021
- How ecological networks evolve
Timothée Poisot, Daniel B. Stouffer·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2016