bioRxivPaleontologyPreprint
Does time matter in phylogeny? A perspective from the fossil record
P. Guenser, R. C. M. Warnock, W. Pett, P. C. J. Donoghue, E. Jarochowska
Abstract
The role of time (i.e. taxa ages) in phylogeny has been a source of intense debate within palaeontology for decades and has not yet been resolved fully. The fossilised birth-death range process is a model that explicitly accounts for information about species through time. It presents a fresh opportunity to examine the role of stratigraphic data in phylogenetic inference of fossil taxa. Here, we apply this model in a Bayesian framework to an exemplar dataset of well-dated conodonts from the Late Devonian. We compare the results to those obtained using traditional unconstrained tree inference. We show that the combined analysis of morphology and stratigraphic data under the FBD range process reduces overall phylogenetic uncertainty, compared to unconstrained tree inference. We find that previous phylogenetic hypotheses based on parsimony and stratophenetics are closer to trees generated under the FBD range process. However, the results also highlight that irrespective of the inclusion of age data, a large amount of topological uncertainty will remain. Bayesian inference provides the most intuitive way to represent the uncertainty inherent in fossil datasets and new flexible models increase opportunities to refine hypotheses in palaeobiology.
- research focus: phylogenetics / evolution
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: Bayesian inference
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ignoring stratigraphic age uncertainty leads to erroneous estimates of species divergence times under the fossilized birth-death process
J. Barido-Sottani, G. Aguirre-Fernandez, … R. C. Warnock·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2018
- Putting the F in FBD analyses: tree constraints or morphological data ?
J. Barido-Sottani, A. Pohle, … R. Warnock·bioRxiv·Jul 7, 2022
- Ignoring fossil age uncertainty leads to inaccurate topology and divergence times in time calibrated tree inference
J. Barido-Sottani, N. van Tiel, … R. C. Warnock·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2020
- Combining fossil taxa with and without morphological data improves dated phylogenetic analyses
Mark C. Nikolic, Rachel C. M. Warnock, Melanie Jane Hopkins·Biology LettersPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2025
- Inaccurate fossil placement does not compromise tip-dated divergence times
N. M. Koch, R. J. Garwood, L. A. Parry·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2022
- Estimating the age of poorly dated fossil specimens and deposits using a total-evidence approach and the fossilized birth-death process
J. Barido-Sottani, D. Zyla, T. A. Heath·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2021