bioRxivEcology
Worldwide Soundscapes: a synthesis of passive acoustic monitoring across realms
K. F. Darras, R. Rountree, S. Van Wilgenburg, A. F. Cord, Y. Chen, L. Dong, A. Rocquencourt, C. Desjonqueres, P. M. Diaz, T.-H. Lin, A. Gasc, S. Marley, M. Salton, L. Schille, P. J. Wensveen, S.-H. Wu, O. Acevedo-Charry, M. Adam, J. Aguzzi, I. Akoglu, M. C. P. Amorim, M. Andre, A. Antonelli, L. Aparecido Do Nascimento, G. Appel, , B
Abstract
Abstract and keywordsO_ST_ABSAimC_ST_ABSThe urgency for remote, reliable, and scalable biodiversity monitoring amidst mounting human pressures on ecosystems has sparked worldwide interest in Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM), which can track life underwater and on land. However, we lack a unified methodology to report this sampling effort and a comprehensive overview of PAM coverage to gauge its potential as a global research and monitoring tool. To remediate this, we created the Worldwide Soundscapes project, a collaborative network and growing database comprising metadata from 409 datasets across all realms (terrestrial, marine, freshwater, and subterranean). LocationWorldwide, 12 200 sites, all ecosystems. Time period1991 to present. Major taxa studiedAll soniferous taxa. MethodsWe synthesise sampling coverage across spatial, temporal, and ecological scales using metadata describing sampling locations, deployment schedules, focal taxa, and recording parameters. We explore global trends in biological, anthropogenic, and geophysical sounds based on 168 recordings from twelve ecosystems across all realms. ResultsTerrestrial sampling is spatially denser (45 sites/Mkm2) than aquatic sampling (0.3 and 1.8 sites/Mkm2 in oceans and fresh water) with only two subterranean datasets. Although diel and lunar cycles are well-covered in all realms, only marine datasets (56%) comprehensively sample all seasons. Across twelve ecosystems, biological sounds show contrasting diel patterns, decline with distance from the equator and negatively correlate with anthropogenic sounds. Main conclusionsPAM can inform macroecology studies as well as global conservation and phenology syntheses, but representation can be improved by expanding terrestrial taxonomic scope, sampling coverage in the high seas and subterranean ecosystems, and spatio-temporal replication in freshwater habitats. Overall, this global PAM network holds promise to support global biodiversity research and monitoring efforts.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Big Data, Sound Science, Lasting Impact: a framework for passive acoustic monitoring
Carrie C. Wall, Megan F. McKenna, … Karolin Thomisch·Big Earth DataPeer-reviewed·Dec 4, 2025
- Spatiotemporal Autocorrelation of Acoustic Indices: Implications for Biodiversity Monitoring
Xinyi Jiang, Yixuan Zhang, … Daiping Wang·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2026
- Listening to tropical forest soils
O. C. Metcalf, F. Baccaro, … A. C. Lees·bioRxiv·May 19, 2023
- A Case Study: Using Passive Acoustic Monitoring Devices In A Growing Urban Landscape To Monitor Avian Diversity
Anshul Gupta, CS Swathi, … Harsha Kumar·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2025
- Sound Advice: A calibration framework for defining detection space in Passive Acoustic Monitoring
Prabhat Sharma, Kunapareddy Kezia, K. Seshadri·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 27, 2026
- Is there an accurate and generalisable way to use soundscapes to monitor biodiversity?
S. S. Sethi, A. Bick, … D. A. Coomes·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2022