Frontiers in GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
SNP Data Quality Control in a National Beef and Dairy Cattle System and Highly Accurate SNP Based Parentage Verification and Identification
Matthew Charles McClureiD, John McCarthyiD, Paul J. FlynniD, Jennifer C. McClureiD, Emma Dair, D. K. O'Connell, John F. KearneyiD
Abstract
A major use of genetic data is parentage verification and identification as inaccurate pedigrees negatively affect genetic gain. Since 2012 the international standard for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) based verification in Bos taurus cattle has been the ISAG 100 and 200 SNP panels. While these SNP sets have provided an increased level of parentage accuracy over microsatellite markers (MS), they can validate the wrong parent for an animal at [≤]1% misconcordance rate levels, indicating that more SNP are needed if a more accurate pedigree is required. With rapidly increasing numbers of cattle being genotyped in Ireland that represent 61 Bos taurus breeds from a wide range of farm types: beef/dairy, AI/pedigree/commercial, purebred/crossbred, and large to small herd size the Irish Cattle Breeding Federation (ICBF) analysed different SNP densities to determine that at a minimum [≥]500 SNP are needed to consistently predict only one set of parents at a [≤]1% misconcordance rate. For parentage validation and prediction ICBF uses 800 SNP selected based on SNP clustering quality, ISAG200 inclusion, call rate (CR), and minor allele frequency (MAF) in the Irish cattle population. Large datasets require sample and SNP quality control (QC). Most publications only deal with SNP QC via CR, MAF, parent-progeny conflicts, and Hardy-Weinberg deviation, but not sample QC. We report here a genomic sample QC pipeline to deal with the unique challenges of >1,000,000 genotypes from a national herd such as SNP genotype errors from mis-tagging of animals, lab errors, farm errors, and multiple other issues that can arise.
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 61
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Field percentile
- top 5%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparative analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellite markers for parentage verification and discovery within the equine Thoroughbred breed
Paul J. Flynn, R. C. Morrin‐O'Donnell, … Krishna Reddy Gujjula·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2021
- Equine Parentage Testing with SNPs and beyond: developing a platform independent panel
Rajesh Patidar, Ghadeer El-Ghabeish, … Saquib Ali Lakhani·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2025
- Development of diagnostic SNP markers for quality assurance and control in sweetpotato breeding programs
Dorcus Chepkesis Gemenet, Mercy N. Kitavi, … Hugo Campos·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2020
- Kinship analysis and pedigree reconstruction by RAD sequencing in cattle
Yiming Xu, Wanqiu Wang, … Jianbo Jian·GigabytePeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2024
- A Multi-Breed Reference Panel and Additional Rare Variation Maximizes Imputation Accuracy in Cattle
Troy N. Rowan, Jesse L. Hoff, … Jared E. Decker·Genetics Selection EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2019
- Marker effect p-values for single-step SNP-BLUP genomic models
Damilola Adekale, Zengting Liu, … Jens Tetens·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2025