Frontiers in Artificial IntelligenceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Deep Active Inference and Scene Construction
R. Conor Heins, Muammer Berk MirzaiD, Thomas ParriD, Karl John FristoniD, Igor KaganiD, Arezoo PooresmaeiliiD
Abstract
Adaptive agents must act in intrinsically uncertain environments with complex latent structure. Here, we elaborate a model of visual foraging - in a hierarchical context - wherein agents infer a higher-order visual pattern (a scene) by sequentially sampling ambiguous cues. Inspired by previous models of scene construction - that cast perception and action as consequences of approximate Bayesian inference - we use active inference to simulate decisions of agents categorizing a scene in a hierarchically-structured setting. Under active inference, agents develop probabilistic beliefs about their environment, while actively sampling it to maximise the evidence for their internal generative model. This approximate evidence maximization (i.e. self-evidencing) comprises drives to both maximise rewards and resolve uncertainty about hidden states. This is realised via minimization of a free energy functional of posterior beliefs about both the world as well as the actions used to sample or perturb it, corresponding to perception and action, respectively. We show that active inference, in the context of hierarchical scene construction, gives rise to many empirical evidence accumulation phenomena, such as noise-sensitive reaction times and epistemic saccades. We explain these behaviours in terms of the principled drives that constitute the expected free energy, the key quantity for evaluating policies under active inference. In addition, we report novel behaviours exhibited by these active inference agents that furnish new predictions for research on evidence accumulation and perceptual decision-making. We discuss the implications of this hierarchical active inference scheme for tasks that require planned sequences of information-gathering actions to infer compositional latent structure (such as visual scene construction and sentence comprehension). Finally, we propose experiments to contextualise active inference in relation to other formulations of evidence accumulation (e.g. drift-diffusion models) in tasks that require planning in uncertain environments with higher-order structure.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 28
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Learning action-oriented models through active inference
A. Tschantz, A. K. Seth, C. L. Buckley·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2019
- Planning and navigation as active inference
Raphael Kaplan, Karl John Friston·Biological CyberneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2018
- Flexible Intentions: An Active Inference Theory
Matteo Priorelli, Ivilin Peev Stoianov·Frontiers in Computational NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2023
- An active inference approach to modeling structure learning: concept learning as an example case
Ryan S. Smith, Philipp Schwartenbeck, … Karl John Friston·Frontiers in Computational NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 19, 2020
- Computational mechanisms of curiosity and goal-directed exploration
Philipp Schwartenbeck, Johannes Passecker, … Karl John Friston·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 10, 2019
- A Bayesian account of generalist and specialist formation under the Active Inference framework
Anthony G. Chen, David A. Benrimoh, … Karl John Friston·Frontiers in Artificial IntelligencePeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2020