bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Explainable Machine Learning Analysis Reveals Gender Differences in the Phenotypic and Neurobiological Markers of Cannabis Use Disorder
Gregory R. NiklasoniD, Eric RawlsiD, Sisi MaiD, Erich KummerfeldiD, Andrea M. MaxwelliD, Leyla R. BrucariD, Gunner DrosseliD, Anna ZilverstandiD
Abstract
BackgroundCannabis Use Disorder (CUD) has been linked to environmental, personality, mental health, neurocognitive and neurobiological risk factors. While many studies have revealed gender differences in CUD, the relative importance of these complex factors by gender has not been described. MethodsWe conducted a data-driven examination of gender differences in CUD in a community sample of young adults (Human Connectome Project [HCP]; n = 1204, 54% female). We employed state-of-the-art machine learning methods [gradient tree boosting, XGBoost] in combination with novel factor ranking tools [SHapleys Additive exPlanations (SHAP)] as an explainable machine learning approach in the multimodal data collected by the HCP (phenotypic and brain data). ResultsWe were able to successfully classify both cannabis dependence and cannabis use levels. Previously identified environmental, personality, mental health, neurocognitive, and brain factors highly contributed to the classification. Predominantly-male risk factors included personality (high openness), mental health (high externalizing, high childhood conduct disorder, high fear somaticism), neurocognitive (impulsive delay discounting, slow working memory performance) and brain (low hippocampal volume) factors. Conversely, predominantly-female risk factors included environmental (low education level, low instrumental support) factors. ConclusionsOur data-driven analysis of gender differences in the multimodal risk factors underlying cannabis dependence and use levels demonstrate that environmental factors contribute more strongly to CUD in women, whereas individual factors such as personality, mental health and neurocognitive factors have a larger importance in men. This warrants further investigations, and suggests the importance of understanding how these differences relate to the development of effective treatment approaches.
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An Integrated Multimodal Model of Alcohol Use Disorder Generated by Data-Driven Causal Discovery Analysis
Eric Rawls, Erich Kummerfeld, Anna Zilverstand·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2021
- Altered Reward Processing in Abstinent Dependent Cannabis Users: Social Context Matters
Kaeli Zimmermann, Keith Maurice Kendrick, … Benjamin Becker·European NeuropsychopharmacologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 15, 2019
- Pleiotropic Loci for Cannabis Use Disorder Severity in Multi-Ancestry High-Risk Populations
Qian Peng, Kirk C. Wilhelmsen, Cindy L. Ehlers·Molecular and Cellular NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2023
- Cannabis use, depression and self-harm: phenotypic and genetic relationships
Karen Hodgson, Jonathan R. I. Coleman, … Cathryn M. Lewis·AddictionPeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2019
- Sex-specific vulnerability to cannabinoid addiction-like behavior and associated miRNA signatures in a WIN 55,212-2 self-administration mouse model
Tatiana Gusinskaia, Maria Fernanda Ponce-Beti, … Elena Martín‐García·bioRxiv·May 25, 2026
- Genome-wide association analysis of lifetime cannabis use (N=184,765) identifies new risk loci, genetic overlap with mental health, and a causal influence of schizophrenia on cannabis use
Joëlle A. Pasman, Karin J. H. Verweij, … Jacqueline M. Vink·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2018