henhaobio
Sign in

IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Efficient Detection of Communities in Biological Bipartite Networks

Paola Pesántez‐CabreraiD, Ananth KalyanaramaniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Methods to efficiently uncover and extract community structures are required in a number of biological applications where networked data and their interactions can be modeled as graphs, and observing tightly-knit groups of vertices (\"communities\") can offer insights into the structural and functional building blocks of the underlying network. Classical applications of community detection have largely focused on unipartite networks--i.e., graphs built out of a single type of objects. However, due to increased availability of biological data from various sources, there is now an increasing need for handling heterogeneous networks which are built out of multiple types of objects. In this paper, we address the problem of identifying communities from biological bipartite networks--i.e., networks where interactions are observed between two different types of objects (e.g., genes and diseases, drugs and protein complexes, plants and pollinators, hosts and pathogens). Toward detecting communities in such bipartite networks, we make the following contributions: i) (metric) we propose a variant of bipartite modularity; ii) (algorithms) we present an efficient algorithm called biLouvain that implements a set of heuristics toward fast and precise community detection in bipartite networks; and iii) (experiments) we present a thorough experimental evaluation of our algorithm including comparison to other state-of-the-art methods to identify communities in bipartite networks. Experimental results show that our biLouvain algorithm identifies communities that have a comparable or better quality (as measured by bipartite modularity) than existing methods, while significantly reducing the time-to-solution between one and four orders of magnitude.

Citations
33
FWCI
1.56
Field percentile
top 17%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISZheng '21Garcia-Alga '17Sah '14Žitnik '18Dzeverin '21Pascual‐Gar '20
65% semantic matchBioinformatics
Minzhang Zheng, Sergii Domanskyi, Carlo Piermarocchi+1 more·Scientific Reports·Mar 11, 2021· 46 citations