Molecular Genetics & Genomic MedicineGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Impact of ultrasonography on identifying noninvasive prenatal screening false-negative aneuploidy
Wei LiiD, Fanwei Zeng, Baitong Fan, Nan YuiD, Jing WuiD, Yun YangiD, Hui HuangiD, Shengli LiiD, Zhiyu PengiD
Abstract
PurposeTo evaluate the impact of ultrasonography (US) on identifying noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) false-negative aneuploidy.\n\nMethodsAnalysis of large population-based NIPS false-negative aneuploidy data comprising karyotypes, clinical outcomes, and US results.\n\nResultsFrom December 2010 to July 2018, a total of 3,320,457 pregnancies were screened by NIPS performed in BGI; among them, 69 NIPS false-negative aneuploidy cases with informed consent were confirmed, and US examination data for 48 cases were not available. Of the 21 cases with US results, 19 (90.5%) had various abnormalities on ultrasound, and 2 (9.5%) cases were shown to be normal on ultrasound. Additionally, 6 out of 7 live born fetuses (approximately 85.7%) were found to have abnormalities on ultrasound. Ventricular septal defects constituted the most frequently observed ultrasound abnormality type among the 21 NIPS false-negative aneuploidy cases.\n\nConclusionNIPS has expanded rapidly worldwide and now accounts for a large proportion of prenatal screening tests in China. This study suggests that abnormal US findings should not be neglected, even when NIPS produces a negative result. Combining NIPS with an US examination can further reduce the incidence of livebirths with aneuploidy.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 3th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Noninvasive Prenatal Screening at Low Fetal Fraction: Comparing Whole- Genome Sequencing and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Methods
Carlo G. Artieri, Carrie E. Haverty, … Dale Muzzey·Prenatal DiagnosisPeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2017
- Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) Results for Participants of the eXtraordinarY Babies Study: Screening, Counseling, Diagnosis, and Discordance
Susan Howell, Shanlee Davis, … Nicole R. Tartaglia·Journal of Genetic CounselingPeer-reviewed·Oct 6, 2022
- High-throughput fetal-fraction amplification increases analytical performance of noninvasive prenatal screening
Noah C. Welker, Albert K. Lee, … Clement S. Chu·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2020
- Systematic evaluation of NIPT aneuploidy detection software tools with clinically validated NIPT samples
Priit Paluoja, Hindrek Teder, … Priit Palta·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2021
- Improving the calling of non-invasive prenatal testing on 13-/18-/21-trisomy by support vector machine discrimination
Jianfeng Yang, Xiaofan Ding, Weidong Zhu·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2018
- Diagnostic Utility of Low-Pass Whole Genome Sequencing in Prenatal Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in an Indian Cohort
Akanksha M Tiwari, Kavyashree Padumale, … Aparna Ganapathy·medRxiv·Jul 7, 2025