What’s Up: an assessment of Causal Inference in the Perception of Verticality

Abstract

The perceptual upright is thought to be constructed by the central nervous system (CNS) as a vector sum; by combining estimates on the upright provided by the visual system and the bodys inertial sensors with prior knowledge that the upright is usually above the head. Results from a number of recent studies furthermore show that the weighting of the respective sensory signals is proportional to their reliability, consistent with a Bayesian interpretation of the idea of a vector sum (Forced Fusion, FF). However, findings from a study conducted in partial gravity suggest that the CNS may rely on a single sensory system (Cue Capture, CC), or choose to process sensory signals differently based on inferred signal causality (Causal Inference, CI). We developed a novel Alternative-Reality system to manipulate visual and physical tilt independently, and tasked participants (n=28) to indicate the perceived upright for various (in-)congruent combinations of visual-inertial stimuli. Overall, the data appear best explained by the FF model. However, an evaluation of individual data reveals considerable variability, favoring different models in about equal proportions of participants (FF, n=12; CI, n=7, CC, n=9). Given the observed variability, we conclude that the notion of a vector sum does not provide a comprehensive explanation of the perception of the upright.