bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
VOCAL SIMILARITY AND DIFFERENCES IN FOUR SPECIES OF THE GENUS ANTHUS: ACOUSTIC FEATURE ANALYSIS OF SOME COMMON CALLS
Abstract
Birds of the same genus often share similar call repertoires, the aim of this paper is to find species-specific and common acoustic features across species. This can be a useful tool for identification purposes and for studying intra-interspecific communication. Similar flight call (tsip) in two closely related species (Anthus pratensis, Anthus spinoletta) were studied to find characteristics, that allows to discriminate the two species with acoustic means. Three different call types (tsip, soft and alarm) of four species of the genus Anthus (A. pratensis, A. spinoletta, A. petrosus, A. cervinus) were also studied to find whether these common call types show different degrees of similarity. Discriminant function analysis correctly classified 98.4% of A. pratensis and A. spinoletta flight calls. Three acoustic parameters showed the highest discrimination power: the frequency modulations, the maximum frequency value and the minimum frequency value of the peak frequency contour. Using these three values I proposed a simpler procedure for recognizing these two species, that allowed a correct classification of 96% of calls.The three call types of the four Anthus species were studied using cross correlation among spectrogram contours. Alarm calls of the four species showed stronger similarity, while the other call types were more distinctive, with soft call seeming to have a lower similarity between species and hence a higher distinctive power. These results suggest the hypothesis that alarm call is similar, because it retains features of a common ancestor easing heterospecific communication, while the other calls showed decreasing similarity and more species-specific features.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evidence for vocal signatures and voice-prints in a wild parrot
S. Q. Smeele, J. C. Senar, … M. B. McElreath·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2023
- Categorical and semantic perception of the meaning of call-types in zebra finches
Julie Estelle Elie, Aude de Witasse-Thézy, … Frédéric E. Theunissen·SciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2025
- Spatial variation in black-headed night monkey (Aotus nigriceps) vocalizations
W. D. Helenbrook, N. A. Linck, … J. A. Saurez·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2019
- Ivory-billed Woodpecker and Blue Jay kent comparisons at spectrogram level reveal differences
John D. Williams·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2024
- Can we trace the social affiliation of rooks (Corvusfrugilegus) through their vocal signature?
K. Martin, F. M. Cornero, … V. Dufour·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2024
- Felidae call type and species identification based on acoustic features
D. Bandara, K. Exantus, … A. Byun·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2022