BMJ OpenBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Multicenter validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU
Qingqing MaoiD, Melissa Jay, Jana L. HoffmaniD, Jacob S. CalvertiD, Christopher Barton, David W. ShimabukuroiD, Lisa Y. ShiehiD, Uli K. ChettipallyiD, Grant Fletcher, Yaniv KeremiD, Yifan Zhou, Ritankar DasiD
Abstract
ObjectivesWe validate a machine learning-based sepsis prediction algorithm (InSight) for detection and prediction of three sepsis-related gold standards, using only six vital signs. We evaluate robustness to missing data, customization to site-specific data using transfer learning, and generalizability to new settings.\n\nDesignA machine learning algorithm with gradient tree boosting. Features for prediction were created from combinations of only six vital sign measurements and their changes over time.\n\nSettingA mixed-ward retrospective data set from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center (San Francisco, CA) as the primary source, an intensive care unit data set from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA) as a transfer learning source, and four additional institutions datasets to evaluate generalizability.\n\nParticipants684,443 total encounters, with 90,353 encounters from June 2011 to March 2016 at UCSF.\n\nInterventionsnone\n\nPrimary and secondary outcome measuresArea under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for detection and prediction of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock.\n\nResultsFor detection of sepsis and severe sepsis, InSight achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 - 0.93) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.86 - 0.88), respectively. Four hours before onset, InSight predicts septic shock with an AUROC of 0.96 (95% CI 0.94 -0.98), and severe sepsis with an AUROC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.79 - 0.91).\n\nConclusionsInSight outperforms existing sepsis scoring systems in identifying and predicting sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. This is the first sepsis screening system to exceed an AUROC of 0.90 using only vital sign inputs. InSight is robust to missing data, can be customized to novel hospital data using a small fraction of site data, and retained strong discrimination across all institutions.\n\nStrengths and limitations of this studyO_LIMachine learning is applied to the detection and prediction of three separate sepsis standards in the emergency department, general ward and intensive care settings.\nC_LIO_LIOnly six commonly measured vital signs are used as input for the algorithm.\nC_LIO_LIThe algorithm is robust to randomly missing data.\nC_LIO_LITransfer learning successfully leverages large dataset information to a target dataset.\nC_LIO_LIRetrospective nature of the study does not predict clinician reaction to information.\nC_LI
- Citations
- 336
- FWCI
- 31.40
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effect of a Sepsis Prediction Algorithm on Patient Mortality, Length of Stay, and Readmission
Hoyt Burdick, Eduardo Pino, … Ritankar Das·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2018
- Pediatric Severe Sepsis Prediction Using Machine Learning
Thomas Desautels, Jana L. Hoffman, … Ritankar Das·bioRxiv·Nov 22, 2017
- Physiomarkers in Real-Time Physiological Data Streams Predict Adult Sepsis Onset Earlier Than Clinical Practice
Franco van Wyk, Anahita Khojandi, … Rishikesan Kamaleswaran·bioRxiv·May 15, 2018
- Multicenter validation of a machine learning algorithm for 48 hour all-cause mortality prediction
Hamid Mohamadlou, Saarang Panchavati, … Ritankar Das·Health Informatics JournalPeer-reviewed·Dec 30, 2019
- A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Hypotensive Events in ICU Settings
M. Chookhachizadeh Moghadam, E. Masoumi, … Z. N. Kain·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2019
- Development and validation of a cellular host response test as an early diagnostic for sepsis
L. Guillou, R. Sheybani, … H. R. O'Neal·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2021