bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Dense geographic and genomic sampling reveals paraphyly and a cryptic lineage in a classic sibling species complex
E. Linck, K. Epperly, P. van Els, G. M. Spellman, R. W. Bryson, R. Canales-del-Castillo, J. E. McCormack, J. Klicka
Abstract
Incomplete or geographically biased sampling poses significant problems for research in phylogeog-raphy, population genetics, phylogenetics, and species delimitation. Despite the power of using genome-wide genetic markers in systematics and related fields, approaches such as the multispecies coalescent remain unable to easily account for unsampled lineages. The Empidonax difficilis / E. occidentalis complex of small tyrannid flycatchers (Aves: Tyrannidae) is a classic example of a widely distributed species with limited phenotypic geographic variation that was broken into two largely cryptic (or \"sibling\") lineages following extensive study. Though the group is well-characterized north of the U.S. Mexico border, the evolutionary distinctiveness and phylogenetic relationships of southern populations remain obscure. In this paper, we use dense genomic and geographic sampling across the majority of the range of the E. difficilis / E. occidentalis complex to assess whether current taxonomy and species limits reflect underlying evolutionary patterns, or whether they are an artifact of historically biased or incomplete sampling. We find that additional samples from Mexico render the widely recognized species-level lineage E. occidentalis paraphyletic, though it retains support in the best-fit species delimitation model from clustering analyses. We further identify a highly divergent unrecognized lineage in a previously unsampled portion of the groups range, which a cline analysis suggests is more reproductively isolated than the currently recognized species E. difficilis and E. occidentalis. Our phylogeny supports a southern origin of these taxa. Our results highlight the pervasive impacts of biased geographic sampling, even in well-studied vertebrate groups like birds, and illustrate what is a common problem when attempting to define species in the face of recent divergence and reticulate evolution.
- organism: non-human primate
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: phylogenetics / evolution
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Tangled History and Taxonomy of an Iconic Chorus Frog Complex Clarified using Genomic Analyses
Chris X. Mcdaniels, Nicole Povelikin, … Lisa N. Barrow·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2026
- Phylogenomics of a genus of "Great Speciators" reveals rampant incomplete lineage sorting, gene flow, and mitochondrial capture in island systems
Jenna M. McCullough, Chad M. Eliason, … Michael J. Andersen·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 18, 2025
- Genetic, vocal, and body size divergence across the Northern Peruvian Low supports two species within the Masked Flowerpiercer (Diglossa cyanea)
S. C. Martinez-Gomez, C. E. Lara, … A. M. Cuervo·bioRxiv·May 18, 2022
- Taxonomic Uncertainty and the Anomaly Zone: Phylogenomics Disentangle a Rapid Radiation to Resolve Contentious Species (Gila robusta complex) in the Colorado River
T. K. Chafin, M. R. Douglas, … M. E. Douglas·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2020
- Gene Flow Creates Fuzzy Species Boundaries in Fence Lizards
Adam D. Leaché, Hayden R. Davis, … Sonal Singhal·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2026
- Phylogenomics and biogeography of the parrot genus Pyrrhura with implications for systematics and conservation
Jaime G. Morin-Lagos, Taylor Hains, … Michael D. Martin·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2026