Nature GeneticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Maximum likelihood pandemic-scale phylogenetics
Nicola De MaioiD, Prabhav KalaghatgiiD, Yatish TurakhiaiD, Russell B Corbett-DetigiD, Bùi Quang MinhiD, Nick GoldmaniD
Abstract
Phylogenetics plays a crucial role in the interpretation of genomic data1. Phylogenetic analyses of SARS-CoV-2 genomes have allowed the detailed study of the viruss origins2, of its international3,4 and local4-9 spread, and of the emergence10 and reproductive success11 of new variants, among many applications. These analyses have been enabled by the unparalleled volumes of genome sequence data generated and employed to study and help contain the pandemic12. However, preferred model-based phylogenetic approaches including maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods, mostly based on Felsensteins pruning algorithm13,14, cannot scale to the size of the datasets from the current pandemic4,15, hampering our understanding of the viruss evolution and transmission16. We present new approaches, based on reworking Felsensteins algorithm, for likelihood-based phylogenetic analysis of epidemiological genomic datasets at unprecedented scales. We exploit near-certainty regarding ancestral genomes, and the similarities between closely related and densely sampled genomes, to greatly reduce computational demands for memory and time. Combined with new methods for searching amongst candidate evolutionary trees, this results in our MAPLE ( MAximum Parsimonious Likelihood Estimation) software giving better results than popular approaches such as FastTree 217, IQ-TREE 218, RAxML-NG19 and UShER15. Our approach therefore allows complex and accurate proba-bilistic phylogenetic analyses of millions of microbial genomes, extending the reach of genomic epidemiology. Future epidemiological datasets are likely to be even larger than those currently associated with COVID-19, and other disciplines such as metagenomics and biodiversity science are also generating huge numbers of genome sequences20-22. Our methods will permit continued use of preferred likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses.
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: phylogenetics / evolution
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 75
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Online Phylogenetics using Parsimony Produces Slightly Better Trees and is Dramatically More Efficient for Large SARS-CoV-2 Phylogenies than de novo and Maximum-Likelihood Approaches
Bryan P. Thornlow, Alexander Krämer, … Russell B Corbett-Detig·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2021
- Horse, not zebra: accounting for lineage abundance in maximum likelihood phylogenetics
Nicola De Maio·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2026
- Pandemic-scale phylogenetics
Cheng Ye, Bryan P. Thornlow, … Yatish Turakhia·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2021
- Variational phylodynamic inference using pandemic-scale data
C. Ki, J. Terhorst·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2022
- Rate variation and recurrent sequence errors in pandemic-scale phylogenetics
Nicola De Maio, Myrthe S Willemsen, … Nick Goldman·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2026
- CMAPLE 2: Fast and Accurate Phylogenetic Inference for Millions of Pathogen Genomes
Nhan Ly-Trong, SAMUEL J. MARTIN, … Bùi Quang Minh·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2026