bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Dementia Severity Is Associated with Resting-State fMRI Network Responses to Nuisance Regression
Ildar Gabitov, Aleksandr Volkov, Tamoghna ChattopadhyayiD, Paul M. ThompsoniD, Yury Maximov
Abstract
Apparent disease effects in resting-state fMRI may be confounded by the effects of preprocessing, making it essential to understand whether nuisance removal affects patients differently across levels of clinical severity. Yet few studies directly examine whether sensitivity to preprocessing is itself clinically informative. We investigated this in 201 ADNI participants spanning normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. We quantified the coordinated temporal structure of the seven Yeo resting-state networks using a delay-based concentration statistic, comparing estimates after regression of 24 motion parameters and linear trends with estimates obtained after additionally removing five anatomical CompCor components. Adding these components generally reduced the measured temporal concentration, but this reduction was smaller in participants with greater dementia severity (+0.472 percentage points per CDR-SB point). In contrast, the same network measures showed little association with severity before adding CompCor. To determine whether this finding depended on how temporal trends were removed, we repeated the analysis with identical discrete cosine regressors added to both preprocessing designs. The clinical association remained similar (+0.464). Controlled simulations showed that temporal concentration increased with the strength of delayed coupling between networks, even when their individual statistical properties and instantaneous covariance remained unchanged. However, changes in observation amplitude and contamination of nuisance regressors also altered the response to preprocessing without changing the underlying neural signal. These findings suggest that disease-related differences in fMRI may partly reflect differential sensitivity to preprocessing. Systematic sensitivity analyses, including multiverse comparisons across preprocessing strategies, may therefore be essential to distinguish genuine disease effects from preprocessing-dependent associations.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Personalized Prediction of Differences in fMRI Connectivity Estimates Across Preprocessing Pipelines
Yury Maximov, Aleksandr Volkov, … Ildar Gabitov·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2026
- Denoising Approach Affects Diagnostic Differences in Brain Connectivity across the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum
Jenna Katherine Blujus, Hwamee Oh, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2022
- Nuisance Effects and the Limitations of Nuisance Regression in Dynamic Functional Connectivity fMRI
Alican Nalci, Bhaskar D. Rao, Thomas T. Liu·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2018
- Impact of gray matter signal regression in resting state and language task functional networks
Luis C. T. Herrera, Gabriela Castellano, … Carlos Lenz Cesar·bioRxiv·Feb 8, 2017
- Modular preprocessing pipelines can reintroduce artifacts into fMRI data
Martin A. Lindquist, Stephan Geuter, … Brian S. Caffo·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jan 21, 2019
- Voxel-wise or Region-wise Nuisance Regression for Functional Connectivity Analyses: Does it matter?
Tobias Muganga, Leonard Sasse, … Kaustubh R. Patil·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2024