Brain and CognitionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Temporal Dynamics of Sensorimotor Integration for Auditory and Proprioceptive Target Information During Movement Preparation and Execution
Abstract
Endpoint movement variability in non-visual (auditory and proprioceptive) target reaching is modality-dependent. This study investigated whether such modality-specific effects may emerge during movement preparation and how they unfold during movement execution. Participants performed reaching movements toward auditory, proprioceptive, or audio-proprioceptive targets. Electromyography and movement kinematics were recorded to examine the effect of target-related sensory modality on sensory encoding and coordination of motor commands during movement preparation, as well as their effect on movement execution. Results revealed a modality-dependent sensory encoding phase, whereas a modality-independent coordination of motor commands. While the target modality did not affect movement initiation, it modulated the subsequent movement execution. These findings demonstrate that, in non-visual target reaching, the effect of target-related sensory modality extends beyond execution to specific phases of movement preparation. Our results support a four-stage model of action control toward non-visual targets, consisting of a modality-dependent sensory encoding phase of movement preparation and early execution, as well as a modality-independent motor coordination and movement initia-tion. These findings provide new insights into the temporal dynamics of sensorimotor control without vision, suggesting a different use of non-visual (proprioceptive and auditory) target-related sensory information during distinct phases of movement preparation and execution. HighlightsO_LIAuditory and proprioceptive target reaching shows modality-specific endpoint variability. C_LIO_LIThis study investigates whether such modulation occurs within the movement preparation stage. C_LIO_LIModality-specific sensory modulation has been found in specific phases of movement preparation. C_LIO_LIModality-specific effects emerge during early and late movement execution. C_LIO_LIFindings support a four-stage model of non-visual action control, separating encoding, coordination, initiation, and execution. C_LI
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: trajectory inference
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 46%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Contribution of Audition and Proprioception in Unisensory and Multisensory Target Reaching
Ivan Camponogara·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2025
- A brief glimpse at a haptic target is sufficient for multisensory integration in reaching movements
Ivan Camponogara, Robert Volcic·Vision ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2021
- Oculomotor inhibition precedes temporally expected auditory targets
Dekel Abeles, Roy Amit, … Shlomit Yuval‐Greenberg·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2020
- Irrelevant auditory and tactile signals, but not visual signals, interact with the target onset and modulate saccade latencies
Manuel Vidal, Andrea Desantis, Laurent Madelain·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2020
- Visual and auditory information shed light on savings mechanisms
Olivier White, Marie Barbiero, … Jean‐Jacques Orban de Xivry·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2019
- Sensory context of initiation-cue modulates action goal-relevant neural representations
Nicholas Kreter, Neil M. Dundon, … Michelle Marneweck·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2024