One EarthEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
TOWARDS CLIMATE-SMART REWILDING: AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR BIODIVERSITY, CLIMATE CHANGE, AND SOCIETY
Gavin StarkiD, Magali WeissgerberiD, Néstor FernándeziD, Laura C. Quintero-Uribe, Marek GiergicznyiD, Nikolaj Rauff Poulsen, Nacho VillariD, Bjorn MolsiD, Elisabeth S. BakkeriD, Angus Monro SmithiD, Georg WinkeliD, Diogo AlagadoriD, José María Rey BeñayasiD, Josep María EspeltaiD, Miriam SelwyniD, Lluís BrotonsiD, Tatiana KluvánkováiD, Stanislava BrnkaľákováiD, Judith KloibhoferiD, Reinhard PresteleiD, Henrik G. SmithiD, Alba Lázaro‐GonzáleziD, Robert BuitenwerfiD, Elena A. PearceiD, Jens‐Christian SvenningiD, , Henrique M. PereiraiD
Abstract
The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aim to restore 30% of degraded ecosystems. Both the IPCC and IPBES highlight the crucial role of ecosystem restoration in addressing the interconnected crises of climate change and biodiversity loss. One key restoration strategy is rewilding, which enhances ecosystem complexity with minimal human intervention. While traditional rewilding strategies often focus on benefits for biodiversity, we propose a climate-smart rewilding framework as a new approach designed to deliver climate benefits alongside biodiversity restoration. This framework seeks to integrate biodiversity, climate change adaptation and mitigation, as well as socio-economic benefits and trade-offs. We illustrate how this framework can be utilized to identify areas across Europe where rewilding could increase carbon sequestration, enhance species abilities to adapt to the velocity of climate change, and maximize wildlife-watching benefits while minimizing the costs associated with livestock-wildlife conflict. Finally, we acknowledge some limitations of climate-smart rewilding, but we argue that its adaptability and low cost render it a promising solution to the challenges facing Europe and beyond.
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 21.23
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Finding space for rewilding: participatory scenarios reveal ecological opportunities based on plural values of nature
Laura Catalina Quintero Uribe, Henrique M. Pereira, … Néstor Fernández·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2025
- One cannot have it all: trading-off ecosystem services and biodiversity bundles in landscape connectivity restoration
Margot Neyret, Daniel Rex Richards, … Sandra Lavorel·Biological ConservationPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2024
- Systematic mapping shows monitoring, evaluation, and engagement are needed to build an evidence base for rewilding
Nell J. Pates, James M. Bullock, … William D. Pearse·Conservation BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2026
- Using artificial intelligence to optimize ecological restoration for climate and biodiversity
Daniele Silvestro, Stefano Goria, … Alexandre Antonelli·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2025
- Assessing the potential ecological functions, ecosystem services and disservices of megaherbivore rewilding in traditional rural wood-pastures
Marco Davoli, Martina de Benedetto, … Stefano Focardi·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2026
- Accounting for social feasibility in landscape-scale scenarios for restoring nature beyond protected areas
Alberto González‐García, Margot Neyret, … Sandra Lavorel·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2026