bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Are Current AI Virtual Cell Models Useful for Scientific Discovery?
Abstract
AI models are increasingly developed to predict the effect of perturbations on gene expression, but current benchmarks fail to reliably measure model performance. Here, we argue that new benchmarks that directly measure the value of model predictions for specific scientific discovery outcomes are needed to address this gap. We present PerturbHD, an evaluation framework for AI-enabled hit discovery, to demonstrate the benefits our proposed approach.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Real Science Is Harder Than Benchmarks: Evaluating Advanced AI Frameworks on Published Studies. I. Uncertainty Quantification, ML on Therapeutic Data Commons, and Agent-Based Modeling
Mohammed O. Ahmed, Sahil Anil Amale, … Anton V. Sinitskiy·bioRxiv·Jun 27, 2026
- Harnessing AI to Build Virtual Cells
Xingyi Cheng, Pan Li, … Eric Poe Xing·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2026
- ReviewBench: An Extensible Framework for Benchmarking Human and AI Manuscript Review
Natalie N. Khalil, T. J. Reed, Matteo R. Ciccozzi·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2026
- How Much Can AI Virtual Cells Gain from Unified Perturbational Modeling?
魏宗婷, Yuedian Ye, … Yuning You·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2026
- Deep Learning-Based Genetic Perturbation Models Do Outperform Uninformative Baselines on Well-Calibrated Metrics
Henry E. Miller, Gabriel Mejia, … Lucas Paulo de Lima Camillo·bioRxiv·Oct 20, 2025
- Real Science Is Harder Than Benchmarks: Evaluating Advanced AI Frameworks on Published Studies. II. Antibody Properties, Lipid-RNA Interactions
Priyanka Bhutada, Nitin Goyal, … Anton V. Sinitskiy·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2026