bioRxivEcology
Assessment of coral restoration's contribution to reef recovery using machine learning
Abstract
Coral restoration emerged globally as a form of life support for coral reefs, awaiting urgent mitigation of anthropogenic pressure. Yet its efficiency is difficult to assess, as ambitious transplantation programs handle hundreds of thousands of fragments, with survival rates inherently time-intensive to monitor. Due to limited available data, the influence of most environmental and methodological factors is still unknown. We therefore propose a new method which leverages machine learning to track each colonys individual health and growth on a large sample size. This is the first time artificial intelligence techniques were used to monitor coral at a colony scale, providing an unprecedented amount of data on coral health and growth. Here we show the influence of genus, depth and initial fragment size, alongside providing an outlook on coral restorations efficiency. We show that among 77,574 fragments, individual survival rate was 31% after 2 years (21% after 4 years), which is much lower than most reported results. In the absence of significant anthropogenic pressure, we showed that there was a depth limit below which Pocillopora fragments outperformed Acropora fragments, while the opposite was true past this threshold. During the mid-2019 heatwave, our research indicates that Pocillopora fragments were 37% more likely to survive than Acropora fragments. Overall, the total amount of live coral steadily increased over time, by more than 3,700 liters a year, as growth compensated for mortality. This supports the use of targeted coral restoration to accelerate reef recovery after mass bleaching events.
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Coral restoration alters reef soundscapes but machine learning and manual analyses suggest different recovery rates
Emily M. Croasdale, Luca Saponari, … Timothy A. C. Lamont·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026
- Accessible AI Enhances Monitoring of Coral Seeding Devices in Reef Restoration
John E. Stratford, Maren Elizabeth Toor, … Renata Ferrari·bioRxiv·Nov 27, 2025
- Evidence of ecosystem process recovery across a large-scale coral reef restoration programme using AI accelerated soundscape analysis
Ben Williams, Mars Coral Restoration Project Monitoring Team, … Kate E. Jones·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2025
- Bio-optical signatures of insitu photosymbionts predict bleaching severity prior to thermal stress in the Caribbean coral species Acropora palmata
K. Hoadley, S. Lowry, … E. Muller·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2023
- Delayed bleaching-induced coral mortality limits reef recovery after a marine heatwave
Andreas Eich, Yannick Chancerelle, … Caroline Dubé·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2026
- Advancing coral micropropagation for coral restoration and reef engineering
Emily Walton, Lindsey Badder, … Daniel Wangpraseurt·Frontiers in Marine SciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2024