Magnetic Resonance in MedicineNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
BISON: Brain tISue segmentatiON pipeline using T1-weighted magnetic resonance images and a random forests classifier
Abstract
IntroductionAccurate differentiation of brain tissue types from T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs) is a critical requirement in many neuroscience and clinical applications. Accurate automated tissue segmentation is challenging due to the variabilities in the tissue intensity profiles caused by differences in scanner models and acquisition protocols, in addition to the varying age of the subjects and potential presence of pathology. In this paper, we present BISON (Brain tISue segmentatiON), a new pipeline for tissue segmentation.\n\nMethodsBISON performs tissue segmentation using a random forests classifier and a set of intensity and location priors obtained based on T1-weighted images. The proposed method has been developed and cross-validated based on multi-center and multi-scanner manual labels of 72 subjects aging from 5-96 years old, ensuring the generalizability of the results to new data from various age ranges. In addition, we assessed the test-retest reliability of BISON on 2 datasets; a. using 20 subjects that had scan/re-scan MRIs and manual segmentations available, and b. using a human phantom dataset including 90 scans from a single individual acquired across 10 years.\n\nResultsThe results of the proposed method were compared against Atropos, a commonly used tissue classification method from ANTs. The proposed method yielded cross-validation Dice Kappa values of {kappa}GM = 0.88 {+/-} 0.03, {kappa}WM = 0.85 {+/-} 0.03, {kappa}CSF = 0.77 {+/-} 0.11, outperforming ANTs Atropos ({kappa}GM = 0.79 {+/-} 0.05, {kappa}WM = 0.84 {+/-} 0.05, {kappa}CSF = 0.64 {+/-} 0.22) as well as test-retest Dice Kappa values of {kappa}GM = 0.94 {+/-} 0.006, {kappa}WM = 0.92 {+/-} 0.006, {kappa}CSF = 0.77 {+/-} 0.11 outperforming both manual ({kappa}GM = 0.92 {+/-} 0.01, {kappa}WM = 0.91 {+/-} 0.01, {kappa}CSF = 0.74 {+/-} 0.03) and ANTs Atropos ({kappa}GM = 0.87 {+/-} 0.001, {kappa}WM = 0.92 {+/-} 0.001, {kappa}CSF = 0.79 {+/-} 0.05). The human phantom dataset validations showed high generalizability for both Atropos ({kappa}GM = 0.97 {+/-} 0.01, {kappa}WM = 0.96 {+/-} 0.01, {kappa}CSF = 0.93 {+/-} 0.02) and BISON ({kappa}GM = 0.95 {+/-} 0.01, {kappa}WM = 0.94 {+/-} 0.01, {kappa}CSF = 0.85 {+/-} 0.03), while Atropos tended to consistently under-segment the cortical CSF. Finally, our assessment of BISON, Atropos, FAST from FSL, and SPM12 segmentations in presence of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) showed that BISON outperforms the other three methods, correctly detecting WMHs as WM.\n\nConclusionOur results show that BISON can provide accurate and robust segmentations in data from different age ranges and various scanner models, making it ideal for performing tissue classification in large multi-center and multi-scanner databases.
- Citations
- 50
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Field percentile
- top 17%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reliability Assessment of Tissue Classification Algorithms for Multi-Center and Multi-Scanner Data
Mahsa Dadar, Simon Duchesne, For the CCNA Group and the CIMA-Q Group·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 12, 2020
- Brain tissue segmentation based on MP2RAGE multi-contrast images in 7 T MRI
Uk-Su Choi, Hirokazu Kawaguchi, … Ikuhiro Kida·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2019
- Multi-Contrast MRI Inputs Enable Self-Consistent Tissue Segmentation & Robust Perivascular Space Identification
Jeffrey L. Gunter, Gregory M. Preboske, … Clifford R. Jack·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2026
- BIBSNet: A Deep Learning Baby Image Brain Segmentation Network for MRI Scans
Timothy John Hendrickson, Paul Reiners, … Eric Feczko·Developmental Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2026
- Deep Learning Based Segmentation of Brain Tissue from Diffusion MRI
Fan Zhang, Anna Breger, … Ofer Pasternak·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2021
- Comparison of classification methods for tissue outcome after ischemic stroke
Ceren Tozlu, Brice Ozenne, … Delphine Maucort‐Boulch·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2019