bioRxivPhysiologyPreprint
Salivary Biomarkers for Classifying Acute Physical Fatigue: A Comparative, Exploratory Study
Bryndan LindseyiD, Kenneth V. BowdeniD, Yosef Shaul, Emanuel F. PetricoiniD, Shane V. CaswelliD, Rayan Alhammad, Anissa N. Elayadi, Brandon M. Roberts, Joel R. MartiniD
Abstract
Introduction: Physical fatigue is a key determinant of operational readiness in tactical athletes. Hormonal, immune, and enzymatic biomarkers have been proposed for fatigue assessment, but reliability can be affected by external factors. Therefore, this study aimed to compare targeted stress-related biomarkers, proteins identified via untargeted salivary proteomics, and a combined panel of both for classifying acute physical fatigue. Methods: Ten recreationally active adults (6M, 4F) completed a fatiguing protocol within a 3-day sample collection window. Saliva samples were analyzed for targeted biomarkers via commercial immunoassays and proteins via untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Targeted, protein, and combined panels were identified using nested leave-one-subject-out cross-validation with FDR correction and stability selection, then classified via ridge-penalized logistic regression. Models were extended across the full protocol to evaluate classification of fatigue onset, rest, and recovery states. Results: A candidate identified protein (C1S) achieved slightly higher classification accuracy (80%) relative to a panel of targeted biomarkers (IgA and UA 70%), with superior sensitivity but similar specificity. In comparison, the combined panel, spanning immune (IgA), oxidative/metabolic (UA), complement (C1S), and cellular stress-related (ANG) outperformed both single-platform models with 90% accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Conclusions: Improved classification accuracy observed with the inclusion of candidate salivary proteins provide preliminary support for non-invasive proteomic monitoring of fatigue in tactical settings, and in particular the combination of complementary targeted and proteomic panels to capture a more complete physiological signature of acute fatigue. Future studies should validate these findings in larger, more diverse populations and assess applicability for chronic fatigue monitoring.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Academic stress through salivary biomarkers: A multivariate analysis of cortisol, IL-1β, CRP, and IgA levels and their variations as a function of sex.
Rodrigo Castillo Klagges, Camila Pezo-Sáez, … F. Treulen·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 20, 2026
- Non-parametric Functional Muscle Network as a Robust Biomarker of Fatigue
Rory O’Keeffe, Seyed Yahya Shirazi, … S. Farokh Atashzar·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health InformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 20, 2023
- A PAM-CNN recognition approach to Muscle Fatigue of Special Operators by sEMG signals
Bin Xu, Lin Minghui, … LI Chang-yu·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2025
- A Data-Driven Model to Identify Fatigue Level Based on the Motion Data from a Smartphone
S. Karvekar, M. Abdollahi, E. Rashedi·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2019
- Method for Identifying Proteomic Biomarkers of Health
Ksenia Zlobina, Ashwin Gopinath, Anu Thubagere·bioRxiv·Dec 6, 2023
- Proteome Profiling of Human Tear Fluid Following Acute Exercise
MingJie Sun, Huilin Yao, … Qinghua Cui·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2026