bioRxivEcology
Improving the accessibility and transferability of machine learning algorithms for identification of animals in camera trap images: MLWIC2
M. A. Tabak, M. S. Norouzzadeh, D. W. Wolfson, E. J. Newton, R. K. Boughton, J. S. Ivan, E. A. Odell, E. S. Newkirk, R. Y. Conrey, J. Stenglein, F. Iannarilli, J. Erb, R. K. Brook, A. J. Davis, J. Lewis, D. P. Walsh, J. C. Beasley, K. C. VerCauteren, J. Clune, R. S. Miller
Abstract
O_LIMotion-activated wildlife cameras (or "camera traps") are frequently used to remotely and non-invasively observe animals. The vast number of images collected from camera trap projects have prompted some biologists to employ machine learning algorithms to automatically recognize species in these images, or at least filter-out images that do not contain animals. These approaches are often limited by model transferability, as a model trained to recognize species from one location might not work as well for the same species in different locations. Furthermore, these methods often require advanced computational skills, making them inaccessible to many biologists. C_LIO_LIWe used 3 million camera trap images from 18 studies in 10 states across the United States of America to train two deep neural networks, one that recognizes 58 species, the "species model," and one that determines if an image is empty or if it contains an animal, the "empty-animal model." C_LIO_LIOur species model and empty-animal model had accuracies of 96.8% and 97.3%, respectively. Furthermore, the models performed well on some out-of-sample datasets, as the species model had 91% accuracy on species from Canada (accuracy range 36-91% across all out-of-sample datasets) and the empty-animal model achieved an accuracy of 91-94% on out-of-sample datasets from different continents. C_LIO_LIOur software addresses some of the limitations of using machine learning to classify images from camera traps. By including many species from several locations, our species model is potentially applicable to many camera trap studies in North America. We also found that our empty-animal model can facilitate removal of images without animals globally. We provide the trained models in an R package (MLWIC2: Machine Learning for Wildlife Image Classification in R), which contains Shiny Applications that allow scientists with minimal programming experience to use trained models and train new models in six neural network architectures with varying depths. C_LI
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Machine learning to classify animal species in camera trap images: applications in ecology
M. A. Tabak, M. S. Norouzzadeh, … R. S. Miller·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2018
- High performance machine learning models can fully automate labeling of camera trap images for ecological analyses
R. C. Whytock, J. Swiezewski, … K. A. Abernethy·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2020
- CameraTrapDetectoR: Automatically detect, classify, and count animals in camera trap images using artificial intelligence
M. A. Tabak, D. Falbel, … R. S. Miller·bioRxiv·Feb 7, 2022
- Location Invariant Animal Recognition UsingMixed Source Datasets and Deep Learning
A. J. Shepley, D. G. Falzon, … P. Kwan·bioRxiv·May 13, 2020
- WildObserve: Camera-trap software that learns species labels during review and estimates occupancy and abundance
Michael A. Tabak·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2026
- A versatile semiautomated image analysis workflow for time-lapsed camera trap image classification.
G. Celis, P. S. Ungar, … D. Ehrich·bioRxiv·Dec 28, 2022